TSTP Solution File: SYN683-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN683-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_31,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p2_31) ).
cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(p2_50,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))
| ~ p25(X1,c33)
| ~ p25(c32,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p2_50) ).
cnf(p25_12,negated_conjecture,
p25(c36,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p25_12) ).
cnf(p25_13,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c36),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p25_13) ).
cnf(p2_40,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',p2_40) ).
cnf(not_p2_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p',not_p2_19) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
p2_31 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))
| ~ p25(X1,c33)
| ~ p25(c32,X1) ),
p2_50 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p25(c36,c33),
p25_12 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c36),
p25_13 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
p2_40 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
| ~ p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
not_p2_19 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SYN683-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:21:19 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwKdG8aToL/E---3.1_5154.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 5237 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 5243 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 55
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses : 55
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 55
% 0.16/0.45 # Processed clauses : 226
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.16/0.45 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 209
% 0.16/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Generated clauses : 612
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 536
% 0.16/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Paramodulations : 612
% 0.16/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 85
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 154
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 72
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 80
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 420
% 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 792
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 55
% 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1315
% 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1144
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 37
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10536
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.068 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.076 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------