TSTP Solution File: SYN672-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SYN672-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:28:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 10 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f130,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f125,f123]) ).
fof(f123,plain,
p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f4(f7(c34,c35),f14(c38,c39))),f4(f7(c34,c35),c40)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f122,f54]) ).
fof(f54,axiom,
! [X111,X110] :
( p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f4(f7(c34,c35),X110)),f4(f7(c34,c35),X111))
| ~ p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),X110),X111) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p30_54) ).
fof(f122,plain,
p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c38,c39)),c40),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f18,f19,f53]) ).
fof(f53,axiom,
! [X108,X109] :
( p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c38,X109)),X108)
| p3(X108,f14(c38,X109))
| ~ p31(f20(c36,X109),f17(c37,X108)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_53) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
p31(f20(c36,c39),f17(c37,c40)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p31_19) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
~ p3(c40,f14(c38,c39)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p3_18) ).
fof(f125,plain,
~ p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f4(f7(c34,c35),f14(c38,c39))),f4(f7(c34,c35),c40)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f6,f40,f89,f39]) ).
fof(f39,axiom,
! [X58,X59,X57,X60] :
( ~ p30(X59,X60)
| p30(X57,X58)
| ~ p9(X59,X57)
| ~ p3(X60,X58) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p30_39) ).
fof(f89,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : p9(f10(X0,f4(f7(c34,X1),f14(c38,X2))),f10(X0,f14(X1,X2))),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f37,f3,f42]) ).
fof(f42,axiom,
! [X65,X68,X66,X67] :
( p9(f10(X65,X66),f10(X67,X68))
| ~ p8(X65,X67)
| ~ p3(X66,X68) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_42) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2] : p8(X2,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_3) ).
fof(f37,axiom,
! [X51,X52] : p3(f4(f7(c34,X51),f14(c38,X52)),f14(X51,X52)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_37) ).
fof(f40,axiom,
~ p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c35,c39)),f4(f7(c34,c35),c40)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p30_40) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X5] : p3(X5,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_6) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN672-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:12:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 % (20768)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (20763)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (20781)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (20773)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (20784)lrs+1010_1:16_acc=on:anc=all:avsq=on:awrs=converge:s2a=on:sac=on:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=81:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/81Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (20765)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (20787)lrs+10_1:1_sos=all:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=20:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/20Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (20776)ott+2_1:64_afp=40000:bd=off:irw=on:i=8:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/8Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (20779)lrs+10_1:7_av=off:awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:bsd=on:cond=on:drc=off:nwc=3.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:s2a=on:s2agt=16:to=lpo:urr=on:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (20763)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.51 % (20781)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Time elapsed: 0.119 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (20763)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (20758)Success in time 0.167 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------