TSTP Solution File: SYN672-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN672-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 1.07s
% Output : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN672-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:26:30 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.52/1.07 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.52/1.07 Process 17940 was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.52/1.07 Tue Jul 12 00:26:30 2022
% 0.52/1.07 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_17786_n010.cluster.edu".
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_17786_n010.cluster.edu
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.52/1.07 set(auto2).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.52/1.07 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.52/1.07 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.52/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.52/1.07 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.52/1.07 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.52/1.07 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.52/1.07 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.52/1.07 clear(print_given).
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (54 formulas)
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.52/1.07 Function symbol KB weights: c34=1. c32=1. c33=1. c38=1. c35=1. c36=1. c37=1. c41=1. c39=1. c40=1. c42=1. f7=1. f14=1. f4=1. f10=1. f12=1. f17=1. f20=1. f23=1. f29=1. f25=1. f27=1.
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.52/1.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/1.07 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.52/1.07 % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.52/1.07 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.52/1.07 % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 0.52/1.07 % Given clauses 98.
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 3 p8(A,A) # label(p8_3) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 6 p3(A,A) # label(p3_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 18 p31(f20(c36,c39),f17(c37,c40)) # label(p31_19) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 19 p3(f4(f7(c34,A),f14(c38,B)),f14(A,B)) # label(p3_37) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 21 -p3(c40,f14(c38,c39)) # label(not_p3_18) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 22 -p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c35,c39)),f4(f7(c34,c35),c40)) # label(not_p30_40) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 41 p30(A,B) | -p30(C,D) | -p9(C,A) | -p3(D,B) # label(p30_39) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 43 p9(f10(A,B),f10(C,D)) | -p3(B,D) | -p8(A,C) # label(p9_42) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 53 p3(A,f14(c38,B)) | p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c38,B)),A) | -p31(f20(c36,B),f17(c37,A)) # label(p3_53) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 54 p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f4(f7(c34,c35),A)),f4(f7(c34,c35),B)) | -p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),A),B) # label(p30_54) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.52/1.07 80 p9(f10(A,B),f10(A,C)) | -p3(B,C). [resolve(43,c,3,a)].
% 0.52/1.07 90 p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f14(c38,c39)),c40). [resolve(53,c,18,a),unit_del(a,21)].
% 0.52/1.07 94 p30(f10(f12(c32,c33),f4(f7(c34,c35),f14(c38,c39))),f4(f7(c34,c35),c40)). [resolve(90,a,54,b)].
% 0.52/1.07 99 p9(f10(A,f4(f7(c34,B),f14(c38,C))),f10(A,f14(B,C))). [resolve(80,b,19,a)].
% 0.52/1.07 116 $F. [ur(41,a,22,a,b,94,a,d,6,a),unit_del(a,99)].
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 Given=98. Generated=211. Kept=115. proofs=1.
% 0.52/1.07 Usable=98. Sos=15. Demods=0. Limbo=2, Disabled=54. Hints=0.
% 0.52/1.07 Megabytes=0.25.
% 0.52/1.07 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.52/1.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.52/1.07
% 0.52/1.07 Process 17940 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 00:26:30 2022
% 0.52/1.07 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------