TSTP Solution File: SYN665-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN665-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 1.02s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN665-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:41:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.76/1.02 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.76/1.02 Process 9445 was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.76/1.02 Tue Jul 12 08:41:14 2022
% 0.76/1.02 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_9292_n016.cluster.edu".
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_9292_n016.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.76/1.02 set(auto2).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.76/1.02 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.76/1.02 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.76/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.02 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.76/1.02 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.76/1.02 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.76/1.02 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.76/1.02 clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (54 formulas)
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.76/1.02 Function symbol KB weights: c34=1. c32=1. c31=1. c33=1. c36=1. c28=1. c30=1. c35=1. c37=1. c29=1. f11=1. f13=1. f15=1. f21=1. f16=1. f18=1. f4=1. f9=1. f17=1. f5=1. f8=1.
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.76/1.02 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.02 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.76/1.02 % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.76/1.02 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.76/1.02 % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.76/1.02 % Given clauses 64.
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 7 p2(A,A) # label(p2_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 12 p25(c36,c33) # label(p25_12) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 13 p25(c32,c36) # label(p25_13) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 20 p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) # label(p2_40) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 23 -p2(A,f16(A,f9(f17(c31)))) # label(not_p2_19) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 35 p2(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(C,B) # label(p2_31) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 49 p2(f11(f4(A),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) | -p25(A,c33) | -p25(c32,A) # label(p2_49) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.76/1.02 88 -p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)). [ur(35,a,23,a,c,20,a)].
% 0.76/1.02 125 p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)). [resolve(49,b,12,a),unit_del(b,13)].
% 0.76/1.02 150 $F. [ur(35,a,88,a,c,7,a),unit_del(a,125)].
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 Given=64. Generated=194. Kept=149. proofs=1.
% 0.76/1.02 Usable=64. Sos=84. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=54. Hints=0.
% 0.76/1.02 Megabytes=0.27.
% 0.76/1.02 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.76/1.02 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.76/1.02
% 0.76/1.02 Process 9445 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 08:41:15 2022
% 0.76/1.02 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------