TSTP Solution File: SYN664-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN664-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:32:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.92s 1.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
p25(c33,c36),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_12) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_14) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X0,f16(X0,f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_19) ).
cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_31) ).
cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_39) ).
cnf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p25(X0,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,X0)
| p2(f11(f4(X0),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_50) ).
cnf(c_458,plain,
f4(c32) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_459,plain,
f11(sP0_iProver_def,c34) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_460,plain,
f4(c33) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_470,plain,
f11(sP2_iProver_def,c34) = sP12_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_471,plain,
f16(sP12_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def) = sP13_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_473,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p25(X0,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,X0)
| p2(f11(f4(X0),c34),sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_458,c_459]) ).
cnf(c_480,negated_conjecture,
p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP13_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_470,c_471]) ).
cnf(c_482,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).
cnf(c_489,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X0,f16(X0,sP5_iProver_def)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).
cnf(c_491,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c33),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_493,negated_conjecture,
p25(c33,c36),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).
cnf(c_495,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
cnf(c_921,plain,
( ~ p25(c33,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,c33)
| p2(f11(sP2_iProver_def,c34),sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_460,c_473]) ).
cnf(c_922,plain,
( ~ p25(c33,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,c33)
| p2(sP12_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_921,c_470]) ).
cnf(c_923,plain,
p2(sP12_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_922,c_491,c_493]) ).
cnf(c_986,plain,
( ~ p2(sP12_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_923,c_482]) ).
cnf(c_1346,plain,
~ p2(sP12_iProver_def,sP13_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_471,c_489]) ).
cnf(c_1416,plain,
p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP12_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_495,c_986]) ).
cnf(c_1430,plain,
( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(sP12_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1416,c_482]) ).
cnf(c_1539,plain,
p2(sP12_iProver_def,sP13_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_480,c_1430]) ).
cnf(c_1541,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1539,c_1346]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN664-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:46:50 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.92/1.22 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ iProver source info
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.92/1.22 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.92/1.22 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 29 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Proving...
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 clauses 40
% 2.92/1.22 conjectures 25
% 2.92/1.22 EPR 15
% 2.92/1.22 Horn 40
% 2.92/1.22 unary 27
% 2.92/1.22 binary 4
% 2.92/1.22 lits 63
% 2.92/1.22 lits eq 15
% 2.92/1.22 fd_pure 0
% 2.92/1.22 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.92/1.22 fd_cond 0
% 2.92/1.22 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.92/1.22 AC symbols 0
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------
% 2.92/1.22 Current options:
% 2.92/1.22 ------
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 ------ Proving...
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.92/1.22
% 2.92/1.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------