TSTP Solution File: SYN664-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN664-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.34s 2.56s
% Output : Refutation 2.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYN664-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:47:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Tue Jul 12 00:47:54 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24172.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 48 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.35 49 back subsumes 34.
% 0.12/0.35 50 back subsumes 35.
% 0.12/0.35 51 back subsumes 36.
% 0.12/0.35 52 back subsumes 37.
% 0.12/0.35 53 back subsumes 38.
% 0.12/0.35 54 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.35 55 back subsumes 40.
% 0.12/0.35 56 back subsumes 41.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 59
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.12/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.12/0.39 distinct predicate count: 15
% 0.12/0.39 distinct function count: 11
% 0.12/0.39 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Changing weight limit from 60 to 55.
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 3 [ 1 1 2115 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 5 [ 1 1 3858 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 7 [ 5 0 2239 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 8 [ 6 1 6260 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Model 9 [ 4 0 3809 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 120 givens.
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79 Changing weight limit from 55 to 32.
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 125 givens.
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.66/1.84
% 1.66/1.84
% 1.66/1.84 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 1.66/1.84
% 1.66/1.84 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 130 givens.
% 1.66/1.84
% 1.73/1.96
% 1.73/1.96
% 1.73/1.96 Changing weight limit from 31 to 26.
% 1.73/1.96
% 1.73/1.96 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 135 givens.
% 1.73/1.96
% 1.88/2.08
% 1.88/2.08
% 1.88/2.08 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.88/2.08
% 1.88/2.08 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 145 givens.
% 1.88/2.08
% 2.10/2.31
% 2.10/2.31
% 2.10/2.31 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 2.10/2.31
% 2.10/2.31 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 175 givens.
% 2.10/2.31
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.34/2.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.34/2.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.16 sec ----> 14562 [binary,14561.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.34/2.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.34/2.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 1 [] {+} -p2(A,f16(A,f9(f17(c31)))).
% 2.34/2.56 13 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 2.34/2.56 25 [] {+} p2(f16(A,B),f16(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 2.34/2.56 28 [] {+} p2(f11(f4(A),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))| -p25(A,c36)| -p25(c32,A).
% 2.34/2.56 53 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 2.34/2.56 58 [] {-} p25(c33,c36).
% 2.34/2.56 60 [] {+} p25(c32,c33).
% 2.34/2.56 65 [] {-} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 2.34/2.56 69 [hyper,60,28,58] {+} p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)).
% 2.34/2.56 109 [hyper,65,13,53] {-} p2(f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))),f11(f4(c32),c34)).
% 2.34/2.56 209 [hyper,69,25,53] {-} p2(f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),A),f16(f11(f4(c32),c34),A)).
% 2.34/2.56 14561 [hyper,209,13,109] {-} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c32),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 2.34/2.56 14562 [binary,14561.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.34/2.56 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 ============ end of search ============
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 true clauses given 66 (28.4%)
% 2.34/2.56 false clauses given 166
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 FALSE TRUE
% 2.34/2.56 8 0 2
% 2.34/2.56 9 0 17
% 2.34/2.56 10 0 132
% 2.34/2.56 11 0 65
% 2.34/2.56 12 0 136
% 2.34/2.56 13 71 294
% 2.34/2.56 14 60 124
% 2.34/2.56 15 56 618
% 2.34/2.56 16 194 346
% 2.34/2.56 17 96 774
% 2.34/2.56 18 30 24
% 2.34/2.56 19 60 0
% 2.34/2.56 20 384 24
% 2.34/2.56 21 693 6
% 2.34/2.56 22 645 74
% 2.34/2.56 23 70 7
% 2.34/2.56 24 191 0
% 2.34/2.56 tot: 2550 2643 (50.9% true)
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 Model 9 [ 4 -15 3809 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.34/2.56
% 2.34/2.56 Process 24172 finished Tue Jul 12 00:47:57 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------