TSTP Solution File: SYN662-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN662-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.47s 4.65s
% Output : Refutation 4.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SYN662-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:01:04 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Tue Jul 12 01:01:04 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11132.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.14/0.38 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.38 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38 48 back subsumes 33.
% 0.14/0.38 49 back subsumes 34.
% 0.14/0.38 50 back subsumes 35.
% 0.14/0.38 51 back subsumes 36.
% 0.14/0.38 52 back subsumes 37.
% 0.14/0.38 53 back subsumes 38.
% 0.14/0.38 54 back subsumes 39.
% 0.14/0.38 55 back subsumes 40.
% 0.14/0.38 56 back subsumes 41.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 59
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.14/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.14/0.41 distinct predicate count: 15
% 0.14/0.41 distinct function count: 11
% 0.14/0.41 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Changing weight limit from 60 to 45.
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Model 4 [ 3 1 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.38/1.54
% 1.38/1.54 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 70 givens.
% 1.38/1.54
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Changing weight limit from 45 to 39.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 105 givens.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.15/2.35
% 2.15/2.35
% 2.15/2.35 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 2.15/2.35
% 2.15/2.35 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 110 givens.
% 2.15/2.35
% 2.24/2.47
% 2.24/2.47
% 2.24/2.47 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 2.24/2.47
% 2.24/2.47 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 115 givens.
% 2.24/2.47
% 2.35/2.59
% 2.35/2.59
% 2.35/2.59 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 2.35/2.59
% 2.35/2.59 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 120 givens.
% 2.35/2.59
% 2.84/3.04
% 2.84/3.04
% 2.84/3.04 Changing weight limit from 35 to 33.
% 2.84/3.04
% 2.84/3.04 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 145 givens.
% 2.84/3.04
% 3.21/3.39
% 3.21/3.39
% 3.21/3.39 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 3.21/3.39
% 3.21/3.39 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 165 givens.
% 3.21/3.39
% 3.36/3.54
% 3.36/3.54
% 3.36/3.54 Changing weight limit from 32 to 29.
% 3.36/3.54
% 3.36/3.54 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 170 givens.
% 3.36/3.54
% 3.42/3.64
% 3.42/3.64
% 3.42/3.64 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 3.42/3.64
% 3.42/3.64 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 175 givens.
% 3.42/3.64
% 4.32/4.49
% 4.32/4.49
% 4.32/4.49 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 4.32/4.49
% 4.32/4.49 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 235 givens.
% 4.32/4.49
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.47/4.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.47/4.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.21 sec ----> 34343 [binary,34342.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.47/4.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.47/4.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 1 [] {+} -p2(A,f16(A,f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.47/4.65 12 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 4.47/4.65 28 [] {+} p2(f11(f4(A),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))| -p25(A,c36)| -p25(c32,A).
% 4.47/4.65 52 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 4.47/4.65 57 [] {+} p25(c33,c36).
% 4.47/4.65 58 [] {+} p25(c32,c33).
% 4.47/4.65 65 [] {-} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.47/4.65 71 [hyper,58,28,57] {+} p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)).
% 4.47/4.65 321 [hyper,71,12,52] {+} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c33),c34)).
% 4.47/4.65 34342 [hyper,321,12,65] {-} p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.47/4.65 34343 [binary,34342.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.47/4.65 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 ============ end of search ============
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 true clauses given 93 (36.2%)
% 4.47/4.65 false clauses given 164
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 FALSE TRUE
% 4.47/4.65 9 0 6
% 4.47/4.65 10 0 138
% 4.47/4.65 11 0 60
% 4.47/4.65 12 0 138
% 4.47/4.65 13 0 299
% 4.47/4.65 14 0 24
% 4.47/4.65 15 0 626
% 4.47/4.65 16 0 72
% 4.47/4.65 17 0 1135
% 4.47/4.65 20 30 0
% 4.47/4.65 21 176 1
% 4.47/4.65 22 276 4
% 4.47/4.65 23 156 0
% 4.47/4.65 24 548 3
% 4.47/4.65 25 124 6
% 4.47/4.65 26 1056 0
% 4.47/4.65 27 146 18
% 4.47/4.65 tot: 2512 2530 (50.2% true)
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 Model 4 [ 3 -7 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.47/4.65
% 4.47/4.65 Process 11132 finished Tue Jul 12 01:01:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------