TSTP Solution File: SYN661-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN661-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.70s 4.96s
% Output : Refutation 4.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN661-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:05:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Mon Jul 11 20:05:13 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29274.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 48 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.35 49 back subsumes 34.
% 0.12/0.35 50 back subsumes 35.
% 0.12/0.35 51 back subsumes 36.
% 0.12/0.35 52 back subsumes 37.
% 0.12/0.35 53 back subsumes 38.
% 0.12/0.35 54 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.35 55 back subsumes 40.
% 0.12/0.35 56 back subsumes 41.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.12/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 59
% 0.12/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.12/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.12/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.12/0.38 distinct predicate count: 15
% 0.12/0.38 distinct function count: 11
% 0.12/0.38 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Changing weight limit from 60 to 45.
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Model 4 [ 3 1 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.26/1.52 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 80 givens.
% 1.26/1.52
% 1.93/2.13
% 1.93/2.13
% 1.93/2.13 Changing weight limit from 45 to 35.
% 1.93/2.13
% 1.93/2.13 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 120 givens.
% 1.93/2.13
% 2.28/2.53
% 2.28/2.53
% 2.28/2.53 Changing weight limit from 35 to 33.
% 2.28/2.53
% 2.28/2.53 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 140 givens.
% 2.28/2.53
% 2.74/2.96
% 2.74/2.96
% 2.74/2.96 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 2.74/2.96
% 2.74/2.96 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 170 givens.
% 2.74/2.96
% 3.13/3.32
% 3.13/3.32
% 3.13/3.32 Changing weight limit from 31 to 29.
% 3.13/3.32
% 3.13/3.32 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 195 givens.
% 3.13/3.32
% 3.13/3.36
% 3.13/3.36
% 3.13/3.36 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 3.13/3.36
% 3.13/3.36 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 200 givens.
% 3.13/3.36
% 3.32/3.51
% 3.32/3.51
% 3.32/3.51 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 3.32/3.51
% 3.32/3.51 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 210 givens.
% 3.32/3.51
% 3.34/3.60
% 3.34/3.60
% 3.34/3.60 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 3.34/3.60
% 3.34/3.60 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 225 givens.
% 3.34/3.60
% 4.49/4.71
% 4.49/4.71
% 4.49/4.71 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 4.49/4.71
% 4.49/4.71 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 350 givens.
% 4.49/4.71
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.70/4.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.70/4.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.52 sec ----> 42068 [binary,42067.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 5.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.70/4.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.70/4.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 1 [] {+} -p2(A,f16(A,f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.70/4.96 8 [] {+} p10(A,B)| -p10(C,A)| -p10(C,B).
% 4.70/4.96 12 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 4.70/4.96 25 [] {+} p2(f11(A,B),f11(C,D))| -p10(B,D)| -p3(A,C).
% 4.70/4.96 27 [] {+} p2(f11(f4(A),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))| -p25(A,c33)| -p25(c32,A).
% 4.70/4.96 48 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 4.70/4.96 51 [] {+} p3(A,A).
% 4.70/4.96 57 [] {+} p10(c37,c34).
% 4.70/4.96 58 [] {+} p25(c36,c33).
% 4.70/4.96 59 [] {+} p25(c32,c36).
% 4.70/4.96 66 [] {-} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.70/4.96 71 [hyper,57,25,51] {+} p2(f11(A,c37),f11(A,c34)).
% 4.70/4.96 74 [hyper,57,8,48] {+} p10(c34,c37).
% 4.70/4.96 88 [hyper,59,27,58] {+} p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)).
% 4.70/4.96 180 [hyper,74,25,51] {+} p2(f11(A,c34),f11(A,c37)).
% 4.70/4.96 6360 [hyper,88,12,180] {+} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c37)).
% 4.70/4.96 41396 [hyper,6360,12,66] {-} p2(f11(f4(c36),c37),f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.70/4.96 42067 [hyper,41396,12,71] {-} p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 4.70/4.96 42068 [binary,42067.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.70/4.96 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 ============ end of search ============
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 true clauses given 135 (35.5%)
% 4.70/4.96 false clauses given 245
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 FALSE TRUE
% 4.70/4.96 9 0 3
% 4.70/4.96 10 0 154
% 4.70/4.96 11 0 132
% 4.70/4.96 12 0 226
% 4.70/4.96 13 1 417
% 4.70/4.96 14 0 184
% 4.70/4.96 15 4 666
% 4.70/4.96 16 0 616
% 4.70/4.96 17 4 102
% 4.70/4.96 18 4 0
% 4.70/4.96 19 25 0
% 4.70/4.96 20 118 0
% 4.70/4.96 21 322 0
% 4.70/4.96 22 516 0
% 4.70/4.96 23 440 0
% 4.70/4.96 24 954 0
% 4.70/4.96 25 112 0
% 4.70/4.96 tot: 2500 2500 (50.0% true)
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 Model 4 [ 3 -8 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.70/4.96
% 4.70/4.96 Process 29274 finished Mon Jul 11 20:05:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------