TSTP Solution File: SYN661-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN661-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:08:55 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.10s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8579/SYN/SYN661-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5285] [nf = 0] [nu = 5200] [ut = 3925]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 1428020] [nf = 60] [nu = 1227301] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 102611772] [nf = 534] [nu = 101864268] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 104074673] [nf = 594] [nu = 103126535] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 255893316
% 	resolvents: 255892291	factors: 1025
% Number of unit clauses generated: 254432188
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.43
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 23	[1] = 3902	[2] = 28075	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 254432188	[2] = 1459488	[3] = 1632	[4] = 8	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p22_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [1] p10_2		(+)3	(-)0
% [2] p12_2		(+)2668	(-)0
% [3] p14_2		(+)5	(-)0
% [4] p18_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [5] p19_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [6] p24_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] p25_2		(+)4	(-)0
% [8] p26_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [9] p27_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [10] p2_2		(+)27644	(-)1
% [11] p3_2		(+)1664	(-)0
% [12] p6_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [13] p7_2		(+)3	(-)0
% [14] p23_3		(+)1	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)31999	(-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 19500192
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 255893316
% Number of unification failures: 14733372
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 27644
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 11113425
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1871185
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1102045
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 19570
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 15202
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 252568285
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 44
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 473889
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 861546
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.90
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.55
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 70
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 270626688
% ConstructUnitClause() = 51547
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.21 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 852978
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.01 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------