TSTP Solution File: SYN660-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN660-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.06s 5.25s
% Output : Refutation 5.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN660-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:00:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Tue Jul 12 03:00:12 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29792.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 48 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.36 49 back subsumes 34.
% 0.12/0.36 50 back subsumes 35.
% 0.12/0.36 51 back subsumes 36.
% 0.12/0.36 52 back subsumes 37.
% 0.12/0.36 53 back subsumes 38.
% 0.12/0.36 54 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.36 55 back subsumes 40.
% 0.12/0.36 56 back subsumes 41.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 59
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 15
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 11
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Changing weight limit from 60 to 45.
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Model 4 [ 3 1 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.45/1.67
% 1.45/1.67 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 80 givens.
% 1.45/1.67
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40 Changing weight limit from 45 to 35.
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.22/2.40 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 115 givens.
% 2.22/2.40
% 2.55/2.76
% 2.55/2.76
% 2.55/2.76 Changing weight limit from 35 to 33.
% 2.55/2.76
% 2.55/2.76 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 130 givens.
% 2.55/2.76
% 3.02/3.22
% 3.02/3.22
% 3.02/3.22 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 3.02/3.22
% 3.02/3.22 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 160 givens.
% 3.02/3.22
% 3.41/3.60
% 3.41/3.60
% 3.41/3.60 Changing weight limit from 31 to 29.
% 3.41/3.60
% 3.41/3.60 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 190 givens.
% 3.41/3.60
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68 Changing weight limit from 29 to 27.
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 195 givens.
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.62/3.88
% 3.62/3.88
% 3.62/3.88 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 3.62/3.88
% 3.62/3.88 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 215 givens.
% 3.62/3.88
% 4.74/4.92
% 4.74/4.92
% 4.74/4.92 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 4.74/4.92
% 4.74/4.92 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 340 givens.
% 4.74/4.92
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 -------- PROOF --------
% 5.06/5.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.06/5.25 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.79 sec ----> 42831 [binary,42830.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 5.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 5.06/5.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.06/5.25 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 1 [] {+} -p2(A,f16(A,f9(f17(c31)))).
% 5.06/5.25 8 [] {+} p10(A,B)| -p10(C,A)| -p10(C,B).
% 5.06/5.25 12 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 5.06/5.25 25 [] {+} p2(f11(A,B),f11(C,D))| -p10(B,D)| -p3(A,C).
% 5.06/5.25 28 [] {+} p2(f11(f4(A),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))| -p25(A,c36)| -p25(c32,A).
% 5.06/5.25 48 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 5.06/5.25 51 [] {+} p3(A,A).
% 5.06/5.25 57 [] {+} p10(c37,c34).
% 5.06/5.25 58 [] {+} p25(c33,c36).
% 5.06/5.25 60 [] {+} p25(c32,c33).
% 5.06/5.25 65 [] {-} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 5.06/5.25 71 [hyper,57,25,51] {+} p2(f11(A,c37),f11(A,c34)).
% 5.06/5.25 74 [hyper,57,8,48] {+} p10(c34,c37).
% 5.06/5.25 107 [hyper,60,28,58] {+} p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)).
% 5.06/5.25 180 [hyper,74,25,51] {+} p2(f11(A,c34),f11(A,c37)).
% 5.06/5.25 19192 [hyper,107,12,180] {+} p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c33),c37)).
% 5.06/5.25 41929 [hyper,19192,12,65] {-} p2(f11(f4(c33),c37),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 5.06/5.25 42830 [hyper,41929,12,71] {-} p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))).
% 5.06/5.25 42831 [binary,42830.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.06/5.25 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 ============ end of search ============
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 true clauses given 137 (35.9%)
% 5.06/5.25 false clauses given 245
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 FALSE TRUE
% 5.06/5.25 9 0 3
% 5.06/5.25 10 0 154
% 5.06/5.25 11 0 132
% 5.06/5.25 12 0 226
% 5.06/5.25 13 2 417
% 5.06/5.25 14 0 184
% 5.06/5.25 15 6 670
% 5.06/5.25 16 0 616
% 5.06/5.25 17 6 105
% 5.06/5.25 18 6 6
% 5.06/5.25 19 17 2
% 5.06/5.25 20 124 18
% 5.06/5.25 21 340 6
% 5.06/5.25 22 544 76
% 5.06/5.25 23 472 51
% 5.06/5.25 24 970 0
% 5.06/5.25 25 74 2
% 5.06/5.25 tot: 2561 2668 (51.0% true)
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 Model 4 [ 3 -10 4259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 5.06/5.25
% 5.06/5.25 Process 29792 finished Tue Jul 12 03:00:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------