TSTP Solution File: SYN659-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:23:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.54s 2.72s
% Output : Refutation 2.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
p7(u,u),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
p12(u,u),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(27,axiom,
p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(29,axiom,
p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(38,axiom,
( ~ p12(u,v)
| ~ p12(u,w)
| p12(w,v) ),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(39,axiom,
~ p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(41,axiom,
( ~ p12(u,v)
| ~ p24(w,u)
| ~ p14(w,x)
| p24(x,v) ),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(45,axiom,
( ~ p7(u,v)
| ~ p12(w,x)
| p14(f15(u,w),f15(v,x)) ),
file('SYN659-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(97,plain,
( ~ p12(u,v)
| p12(v,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,38]),
[iquote('0:Res:10.0,38.0')] ).
cnf(100,plain,
p12(f13(c40,c41),f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,97]),
[iquote('0:Res:29.0,97.0')] ).
cnf(276,plain,
( ~ p24(u,v)
| ~ p14(u,w)
| p24(w,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,41]),
[iquote('0:Res:10.0,41.0')] ).
cnf(415,plain,
( ~ p14(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),u)
| p24(u,f13(c32,c33)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,276]),
[iquote('0:Res:27.0,276.0')] ).
cnf(1515,plain,
( ~ p7(c29,u)
| ~ p12(f13(c40,c41),v)
| p24(f15(u,v),f13(c32,c33)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[45,415]),
[iquote('0:Res:45.2,415.0')] ).
cnf(8372,plain,
( ~ p7(c29,c29)
| ~ p12(f13(c40,c41),f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1515,39]),
[iquote('0:Res:1515.2,39.0')] ).
cnf(8381,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[8372,3,100]),
[iquote('0:MRR:8372.0,8372.1,3.0,100.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:10:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.54/2.72
% 2.54/2.72 SPASS V 3.9
% 2.54/2.72 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.54/2.72 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.54/2.72 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.54/2.72 SPASS derived 8088 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 4630 clauses.
% 2.54/2.72 SPASS allocated 80548 KBytes.
% 2.54/2.72 SPASS spent 0:00:02.34 on the problem.
% 2.54/2.72 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 2.54/2.72 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.54/2.72 0:00:00.07 for inferences.
% 2.54/2.72 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 2.54/2.72 0:00:02.18 for the reduction.
% 2.54/2.72
% 2.54/2.72
% 2.54/2.72 Here is a proof with depth 4, length 15 :
% 2.54/2.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.54/2.72 Formulae used in the proof : p7_3 p12_10 p24_27 p12_29 p12_38 not_p24_39 p24_41 p14_45
% 2.54/2.72
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------