TSTP Solution File: SYN659-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.91s 3.15s
% Output : Refutation 2.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:18:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Tue Jul 12 02:18:55 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27180.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 45 back subsumes 32.
% 0.13/0.36 46 back subsumes 33.
% 0.13/0.36 47 back subsumes 34.
% 0.13/0.36 48 back subsumes 35.
% 0.13/0.36 49 back subsumes 36.
% 0.13/0.36 50 back subsumes 43.
% 0.13/0.36 50 back subsumes 37.
% 0.13/0.36 51 back subsumes 38.
% 0.13/0.36 52 back subsumes 39.
% 0.13/0.36 53 back subsumes 40.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.45/0.66 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.45/0.66 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.45/0.66 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.45/0.66 number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.45/0.66 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.45/0.66 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.45/0.66 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.45/0.66 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.45/0.66 distinct predicate count: 14
% 0.45/0.66 distinct function count: 11
% 0.45/0.66 distinct constant count: 15
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.45/0.66
% 0.45/0.66 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Changing weight limit from 60 to 21.
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Model 2 [ 1 1 2896 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Model 3 [ 6 1 1462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.63 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 330 givens.
% 2.41/2.63
% 2.41/2.64
% 2.41/2.64
% 2.41/2.64 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 2.41/2.64
% 2.41/2.64 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 340 givens.
% 2.41/2.64
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 380 givens.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Changing weight limit from 19 to 20.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 395 givens.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Changing weight limit from 20 to 21.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 400 givens.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Changing weight limit from 21 to 22.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.67 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 405 givens.
% 2.41/2.67
% 2.41/2.68
% 2.41/2.68
% 2.41/2.68 Changing weight limit from 22 to 19.
% 2.41/2.68
% 2.41/2.68 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 410 givens.
% 2.41/2.68
% 2.52/2.71
% 2.52/2.71
% 2.52/2.71 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.52/2.71
% 2.52/2.71 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 435 givens.
% 2.52/2.71
% 2.52/2.74
% 2.52/2.74
% 2.52/2.74 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.52/2.74
% 2.52/2.74 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 490 givens.
% 2.52/2.74
% 2.52/2.77
% 2.52/2.77
% 2.52/2.77 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 2.52/2.77
% 2.52/2.77 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 565 givens.
% 2.52/2.77
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 685 givens.
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.83 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 690 givens.
% 2.63/2.83
% 2.63/2.86
% 2.63/2.86
% 2.63/2.86 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 2.63/2.86
% 2.63/2.86 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 735 givens.
% 2.63/2.86
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 815 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 820 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 825 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 830 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 17 to 15.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 835 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 845 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 850 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 855 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 18 to 19.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 860 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 19 to 20.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 865 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 20 to 21.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 870 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Changing weight limit from 21 to 16.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.88 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 875 givens.
% 2.63/2.88
% 2.63/2.89
% 2.63/2.89
% 2.63/2.89 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 2.63/2.89
% 2.63/2.89 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 880 givens.
% 2.63/2.89
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1365 givens.
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 1370 givens.
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1495 givens.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.91/3.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.91/3.15 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.74 sec ----> 7783 [binary,7782.1,19.1] {-} $F.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 6.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.91/3.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.91/3.15 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 10 [] {+} p10(A,B)| -p10(C,A)| -p10(C,B).
% 2.91/3.15 11 [] {+} p7(A,B)| -p7(C,A)| -p7(C,B).
% 2.91/3.15 15 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 2.91/3.15 18 [] {+} p12(A,B)| -p12(C,A)| -p12(C,B).
% 2.91/3.15 19 [] {+} -p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 21 [] {+} p24(A,B)| -p14(C,A)| -p24(C,D)| -p12(D,B).
% 2.91/3.15 24 [] {+} p12(f13(A,B),f13(C,D))| -p10(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 2.91/3.15 25 [] {+} p14(f15(A,B),f15(C,D))| -p12(B,D)| -p7(A,C).
% 2.91/3.15 45 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 2.91/3.15 46 [] {-} p7(A,A).
% 2.91/3.15 50 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 2.91/3.15 52 [] {-} p14(A,A).
% 2.91/3.15 53 [] {-} p12(A,A).
% 2.91/3.15 55 [] {-} p10(f16(c31),c32).
% 2.91/3.15 56 [] {+} p7(f8(c28),c29).
% 2.91/3.15 58 [] {+} p2(f17(c31),c33).
% 2.91/3.15 61 [] {-} p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 63 [] {+} p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)).
% 2.91/3.15 69 [hyper,56,25,53] {+} p14(f15(f8(c28),A),f15(c29,A)).
% 2.91/3.15 70 [hyper,56,11,46] {+} p7(c29,f8(c28)).
% 2.91/3.15 78 [hyper,55,24,50] {+} p12(f13(f16(c31),A),f13(c32,A)).
% 2.91/3.15 80 [hyper,55,10,45] {-} p10(c32,f16(c31)).
% 2.91/3.15 84 [hyper,80,24,50] {+} p12(f13(c32,A),f13(f16(c31),A)).
% 2.91/3.15 95 [hyper,58,24,45] {+} p12(f13(A,f17(c31)),f13(A,c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 96 [hyper,58,15,50] {+} p2(c33,f17(c31)).
% 2.91/3.15 112 [hyper,70,25,53] {+} p14(f15(c29,A),f15(f8(c28),A)).
% 2.91/3.15 125 [hyper,96,24,45] {+} p12(f13(A,c33),f13(A,f17(c31))).
% 2.91/3.15 157 [hyper,63,18,53] {+} p12(f13(c40,c41),f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))).
% 2.91/3.15 480 [hyper,84,21,52,61] {-} p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(f16(c31),c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 539 [hyper,112,21,480,78] {-} p24(f15(f8(c28),f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 567 [hyper,125,21,69,539] {-} p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,f17(c31))).
% 2.91/3.15 978 [hyper,157,25,46] {+} p14(f15(A,f13(c40,c41)),f15(A,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)))).
% 2.91/3.15 7782 [hyper,978,21,567,95] {-} p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)).
% 2.91/3.15 7783 [binary,7782.1,19.1] {-} $F.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.91/3.15 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 ============ end of search ============
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 true clauses given 1332 (88.9%)
% 2.91/3.15 false clauses given 166
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 FALSE TRUE
% 2.91/3.15 13 0 476
% 2.91/3.15 14 0 1305
% 2.91/3.15 15 0 717
% 2.91/3.15 16 0 1
% 2.91/3.15 tot: 0 2499 (100.0% true)
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Model 3 [ 6 -20 1462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.91/3.15
% 2.91/3.15 Process 27180 finished Tue Jul 12 02:18:57 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------