TSTP Solution File: SYN659-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.10s 0.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p24_41,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,X2)
| ~ p14(X3,X1)
| ~ p24(X3,X4)
| ~ p12(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p24_41) ).
cnf(p12_10,negated_conjecture,
p12(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p12_10) ).
cnf(p14_45,negated_conjecture,
( p14(f15(X1,X2),f15(X3,X4))
| ~ p12(X2,X4)
| ~ p7(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p14_45) ).
cnf(p12_38,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(X3,X1)
| ~ p12(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p12_38) ).
cnf(p24_27,negated_conjecture,
p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p24_27) ).
cnf(p12_29,negated_conjecture,
p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p12_29) ).
cnf(not_p24_39,negated_conjecture,
~ p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',not_p24_39) ).
cnf(p7_3,negated_conjecture,
p7(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p',p7_3) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,X2)
| ~ p14(X3,X1)
| ~ p24(X3,X4)
| ~ p12(X4,X2) ),
p24_41 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p12(X1,X1),
p12_10 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,X2)
| ~ p24(X3,X2)
| ~ p14(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p14(f15(X1,X2),f15(X3,X4))
| ~ p12(X2,X4)
| ~ p7(X1,X3) ),
p14_45 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(X3,X1)
| ~ p12(X3,X2) ),
p12_38 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f15(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ p24(f15(X4,X5),X3)
| ~ p12(X5,X2)
| ~ p7(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)),
p24_27 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)),
p12_29 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)),
not_p24_39 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f15(X1,X2),f13(c32,c33))
| ~ p12(f13(c40,c41),X2)
| ~ p7(c29,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p12(f13(c40,c41),f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p7(X1,X1),
p7_3 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:32:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TGNYqSP6xl/E---3.1_3207.p
% 2.10/0.75 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 2.10/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.10/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # sh5l with pid 3374 completed with status 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Result found by sh5l
% 2.10/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.10/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.10/0.75 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.10/0.75 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3382 completed with status 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 2.10/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.10/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.10/0.75 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.10/0.75 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.10/0.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 2.10/0.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 2.10/0.75 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.10/0.75
% 2.10/0.75 # Proof found!
% 2.10/0.75 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.10/0.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.10/0.75 # Parsed axioms : 51
% 2.10/0.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Initial clauses : 51
% 2.10/0.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 2.10/0.75 # Processed clauses : 4032
% 2.10/0.75 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # ...subsumed : 2853
% 2.10/0.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 1179
% 2.10/0.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Backward-subsumed : 30
% 2.10/0.75 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Generated clauses : 18088
% 2.10/0.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17228
% 2.10/0.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Paramodulations : 18088
% 2.10/0.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # NegExts : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Total rewrite steps : 4032
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.10/0.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 1098
% 2.10/0.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 2.10/0.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 2.10/0.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 1067
% 2.10/0.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13258
% 2.10/0.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 55985
% 2.10/0.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 81
% 2.10/0.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 269659
% 2.10/0.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 236415
% 2.10/0.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2883
% 2.10/0.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 2.10/0.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 2.10/0.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.10/0.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 218626
% 2.10/0.75
% 2.10/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.10/0.75 # User time : 0.243 s
% 2.10/0.75 # System time : 0.011 s
% 2.10/0.75 # Total time : 0.254 s
% 2.10/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 2.10/0.75
% 2.10/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.10/0.75 # User time : 0.245 s
% 2.10/0.75 # System time : 0.014 s
% 2.10/0.75 # Total time : 0.258 s
% 2.10/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 2.10/0.75 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------