TSTP Solution File: SYN659-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 19.33s 9.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 49
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 65 ( 13 unt; 40 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 26 ~; 23 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 43 ( 25 >; 18 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 15 ( 14 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 (; 40 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p23 > p7 > p6 > p3 > p26 > p25 > p24 > p20 > p2 > p19 > p14 > p12 > p10 > p22 > f21 > f15 > f13 > f11 > #nlpp > f9 > f8 > f5 > f4 > f18 > f17 > f16 > c41 > c40 > c39 > c38 > c37 > c36 > c35 > c34 > c33 > c32 > c31 > c30 > c29 > c28 > c27
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(f11,type,
f11: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f18,type,
f18: $i > $i ).
tff(c37,type,
c37: $i ).
tff(f13,type,
f13: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f17,type,
f17: $i > $i ).
tff(p2,type,
p2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c40,type,
c40: $i ).
tff(c34,type,
c34: $i ).
tff(p20,type,
p20: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(p23,type,
p23: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c32,type,
c32: $i ).
tff(c27,type,
c27: $i ).
tff(c41,type,
c41: $i ).
tff(f16,type,
f16: $i > $i ).
tff(c39,type,
c39: $i ).
tff(p22,type,
p22: $i > $o ).
tff(f5,type,
f5: $i > $i ).
tff(p3,type,
p3: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c38,type,
c38: $i ).
tff(c36,type,
c36: $i ).
tff(p19,type,
p19: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f9,type,
f9: $i > $i ).
tff(p25,type,
p25: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c29,type,
c29: $i ).
tff(p14,type,
p14: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(p24,type,
p24: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c30,type,
c30: $i ).
tff(f8,type,
f8: $i > $i ).
tff(p10,type,
p10: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f4,type,
f4: $i > $i ).
tff(p6,type,
p6: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c35,type,
c35: $i ).
tff(f15,type,
f15: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c31,type,
c31: $i ).
tff(c28,type,
c28: $i ).
tff(p26,type,
p26: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f21,type,
f21: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(p7,type,
p7: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(p12,type,
p12: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c33,type,
c33: $i ).
tff(f_96,axiom,
p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
! [X87] : p7(X87,X87),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_227,axiom,
! [X23,X24,X25,X26] :
( p14(f15(X23,X24),f15(X25,X26))
| ~ p12(X24,X26)
| ~ p7(X23,X25) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [X20] : p14(X20,X20),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_160,axiom,
! [X21,X22,X20] :
( p14(X21,X22)
| ~ p14(X20,X21)
| ~ p14(X20,X22) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_94,axiom,
p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_40,axiom,
! [X13] : p12(X13,X13),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_192,axiom,
! [X67,X68,X70,X69] :
( p24(X67,X68)
| ~ p14(X70,X67)
| ~ p24(X70,X69)
| ~ p12(X69,X68) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_170,axiom,
~ p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_58,plain,
p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_96]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [X87_2] : p7(X87_2,X87_2),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_841,plain,
! [X23_214,X25_215,X24_216,X26_217] :
( ~ p7(X23_214,X25_215)
| ~ p12(X24_216,X26_217)
| p14(f15(X23_214,X24_216),f15(X25_215,X26_217)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_227]) ).
tff(c_18,plain,
! [X20_8] : p14(X20_8,X20_8),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_320,plain,
! [X20_161,X22_162,X21_163] :
( ~ p14(X20_161,X22_162)
| ~ p14(X20_161,X21_163)
| p14(X21_163,X22_162) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_160]) ).
tff(c_326,plain,
! [X20_8,X21_163] :
( ~ p14(X20_8,X21_163)
| p14(X21_163,X20_8) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_320]) ).
tff(c_11026,plain,
! [X25_734,X26_735,X23_736,X24_737] :
( p14(f15(X25_734,X26_735),f15(X23_736,X24_737))
| ~ p7(X23_736,X25_734)
| ~ p12(X24_737,X26_735) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_841,c_326]) ).
tff(c_54,plain,
p24(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),f13(c32,c33)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_94]) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
! [X13_9] : p12(X13_9,X13_9),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).
tff(c_611,plain,
! [X69_192,X68_193,X70_194,X67_195] :
( ~ p12(X69_192,X68_193)
| ~ p24(X70_194,X69_192)
| ~ p14(X70_194,X67_195)
| p24(X67_195,X68_193) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_192]) ).
tff(c_1725,plain,
! [X70_299,X13_300,X67_301] :
( ~ p24(X70_299,X13_300)
| ~ p14(X70_299,X67_301)
| p24(X67_301,X13_300) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_611]) ).
tff(c_1730,plain,
! [X67_301] :
( ~ p14(f15(c29,f13(c40,c41)),X67_301)
| p24(X67_301,f13(c32,c33)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_1725]) ).
tff(c_41533,plain,
! [X23_1286,X24_1287] :
( p24(f15(X23_1286,X24_1287),f13(c32,c33))
| ~ p7(X23_1286,c29)
| ~ p12(X24_1287,f13(c40,c41)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11026,c_1730]) ).
tff(c_78,plain,
~ p24(f15(c29,f13(f16(c39),f17(c39))),f13(c32,c33)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_170]) ).
tff(c_41560,plain,
( ~ p7(c29,c29)
| ~ p12(f13(f16(c39),f17(c39)),f13(c40,c41)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_41533,c_78]) ).
tff(c_41584,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_58,c_6,c_41560]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN659-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:25:15 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 19.33/9.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.33/9.42
% 19.33/9.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 19.43/9.44
% 19.43/9.44 Inference rules
% 19.43/9.44 ----------------------
% 19.43/9.44 #Ref : 0
% 19.43/9.44 #Sup : 11351
% 19.43/9.44 #Fact : 0
% 19.43/9.44 #Define : 0
% 19.43/9.44 #Split : 57
% 19.43/9.44 #Chain : 0
% 19.43/9.44 #Close : 0
% 19.43/9.44
% 19.43/9.44 Ordering : KBO
% 19.43/9.44
% 19.43/9.44 Simplification rules
% 19.43/9.44 ----------------------
% 19.43/9.44 #Subsume : 2821
% 19.43/9.44 #Demod : 1945
% 19.43/9.44 #Tautology : 817
% 19.43/9.44 #SimpNegUnit : 134
% 19.43/9.44 #BackRed : 28
% 19.43/9.44
% 19.43/9.44 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 19.43/9.44 #Strategies tried : 1
% 19.43/9.44
% 19.43/9.44 Timing (in seconds)
% 19.43/9.44 ----------------------
% 19.43/9.45 Preprocessing : 0.54
% 19.43/9.45 Parsing : 0.30
% 19.43/9.45 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 19.43/9.45 Main loop : 7.89
% 19.43/9.45 Inferencing : 1.49
% 19.43/9.45 Reduction : 2.13
% 19.43/9.45 Demodulation : 1.35
% 19.43/9.45 BG Simplification : 0.08
% 19.43/9.45 Subsumption : 3.52
% 19.43/9.45 Abstraction : 0.10
% 19.43/9.45 MUC search : 0.00
% 19.43/9.45 Cooper : 0.00
% 19.43/9.45 Total : 8.47
% 19.43/9.45 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 19.43/9.45 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 19.43/9.45 Index Matching : 0.00
% 19.43/9.45 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------