TSTP Solution File: SYN658-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN658-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:18:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 12 unt; 7 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 53 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p24_45,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f19(f20(c34,c31)),f19(f20(c34,X1)))
| ~ p25(X1,f18(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p24_45) ).
cnf(p6_48,negated_conjecture,
( p6(f21(X1),f10(c33))
| p25(f22(X1,X2,X3),f18(X1))
| p4(f5(X1,c36,X2),f5(X1,c36,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p6_48) ).
cnf(p6_25,negated_conjecture,
( p6(X1,X2)
| ~ p6(X3,X1)
| ~ p6(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p6_25) ).
cnf(p6_15,negated_conjecture,
p6(f21(f8(X1,f9(X2,X3))),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p6_15) ).
cnf(p6_49,negated_conjecture,
( p6(f21(X1),f10(c33))
| p4(f5(X1,c36,X2),f5(X1,c36,X3))
| ~ p24(f19(f20(X2,X3)),f19(f20(X2,f22(X1,X2,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p6_49) ).
cnf(p6_3,negated_conjecture,
p6(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p6_3) ).
cnf(p4_26,negated_conjecture,
( p4(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p4(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p4_26) ).
cnf(p4_4,negated_conjecture,
p4(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',p4_4) ).
cnf(not_p6_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p6(c28,f10(c33)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',not_p6_11) ).
cnf(not_p4_44,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c31),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c34)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p',not_p4_44) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f19(f20(c34,c31)),f19(f20(c34,X1)))
| ~ p25(X1,f18(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)))) ),
p24_45 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p6(f21(X1),f10(c33))
| p25(f22(X1,X2,X3),f18(X1))
| p4(f5(X1,c36,X2),f5(X1,c36,X3)) ),
p6_48 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p6(X1,X2)
| ~ p6(X3,X1)
| ~ p6(X3,X2) ),
p6_25 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p6(f21(f8(X1,f9(X2,X3))),X2),
p6_15 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p6(f21(X1),f10(c33))
| p4(f5(X1,c36,X2),f5(X1,c36,X3))
| ~ p24(f19(f20(X2,X3)),f19(f20(X2,f22(X1,X2,X3)))) ),
p6_49 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f19(f20(c34,c31)),f19(f20(c34,f22(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),X1,X2))))
| p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,X1),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,X2))
| p6(f21(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29))),f10(c33)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p6(X1,X1),
p6_3 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p6(X1,X2)
| ~ p6(f21(f8(X3,f9(X2,X4))),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c34),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c31))
| p6(f21(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29))),f10(c33)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p4(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p4(X3,X2) ),
p4_26 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p4(X1,X1),
p4_4 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( p6(X1,X2)
| ~ p6(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c34),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c31))
| p6(f10(c33),c28) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ p6(c28,f10(c33)),
not_p6_11 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( p4(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c34),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c31)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c31),f5(f8(c27,f9(c28,c29)),c36,c34)),
not_p4_44 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN658-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:42:15 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DuYLST924X/E---3.1_11042.p
% 0.22/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 11120 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.22/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.59 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 11125 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.22/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.59 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.22/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.22/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 0.22/0.59 # Processed clauses : 426
% 0.22/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 33
% 0.22/0.59 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 393
% 0.22/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.22/0.59 # Generated clauses : 3179
% 0.22/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3013
% 0.22/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Paramodulations : 3179
% 0.22/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 193
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 341
% 0.22/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 125
% 0.22/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 214
% 0.22/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2661
% 0.22/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 3770
% 0.22/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 52
% 0.22/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5951
% 0.22/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5407
% 0.22/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.22/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 736
% 0.22/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 86225
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 # User time : 0.062 s
% 0.22/0.59 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.59 # Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.22/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 # User time : 0.363 s
% 0.22/0.59 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.59 # Total time : 0.378 s
% 0.22/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.22/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------