TSTP Solution File: SYN657-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN657-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:06:45 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.13s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8853/SYN/SYN657-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 2659] [nf = 0] [nu = 2571] [ut = 2040]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 817693] [nf = 54] [nu = 657695] [ut = 25458]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 20315035] [nf = 116] [nu = 20059240] [ut = 25458]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 127 secs [nr = 21167098] [nf = 170] [nu = 20751393] [ut = 25458]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 50254569
% 	resolvents: 50254367	factors: 202
% Number of unit clauses generated: 49774015
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.04
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 20	[1] = 2020	[2] = 23418	
% Total = 25458
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 49774015	[2] = 480231	[3] = 323	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p17_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [1] p23_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [2] p24_2		(+)5	(-)0
% [3] p25_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [4] p26_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [5] p2_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [6] p3_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [7] p4_2		(+)23487	(-)1
% [8] p6_2		(+)1953	(-)2
% [9] p7_2		(+)1	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)25455	(-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 25458
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1144304
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 50254569
% Number of unification failures: 19302464
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 27393
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 772657
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 362951
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 66156
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 49666421
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 13025154
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 48
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 13
% Number of states in UCFA table: 527998
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 816085
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 1.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.65
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 69
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 69557033
% ConstructUnitClause() = 49691859
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 170.79 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 167515
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.07 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------