TSTP Solution File: SYN648-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN648-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 9 unt; 3 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 51 ( 0 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p24_30,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f4(c30,X1),X2)
| ~ p24(f4(f6(c32,c30),X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p24_30) ).
cnf(p24_44,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| p24(f4(f6(c32,X2),f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,X1),X3),X4),X2)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,X1),X3),X4),X2))
| ~ p3(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X4,X2)
| ~ p26(c31,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,f4(X4,c28)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p24_44) ).
cnf(p26_15,negated_conjecture,
p26(c31,c30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p26_15) ).
cnf(p24_43,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| ~ p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X4)
| ~ p26(c31,X4)
| ~ p3(X2,f4(X3,c28))
| ~ p24(f4(X4,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,X1),X2),X3),X4)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,X1),X2),X3),X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p24_43) ).
cnf(p3_5,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p3_5) ).
cnf(not_p24_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p24(f4(c27,c28),c29),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',not_p24_16) ).
cnf(p2_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(c27,c30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p',p2_14) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f4(c30,X1),X2)
| ~ p24(f4(f6(c32,c30),X1),X2) ),
p24_30 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| p24(f4(f6(c32,X2),f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,X1),X3),X4),X2)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,X1),X3),X4),X2))
| ~ p3(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X4,X2)
| ~ p26(c31,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,f4(X4,c28)) ),
p24_44 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p26(c31,c30),
p26_15 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| ~ p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X4)
| ~ p26(c31,X4)
| ~ p3(X2,f4(X3,c28))
| ~ p24(f4(X4,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,X1),X2),X3),X4)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,X1),X2),X3),X4)) ),
p24_43 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f4(c30,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,X1),X2),X3),c30)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,X1),X2),X3),c30))
| p24(X1,c29)
| ~ p2(X3,c30)
| ~ p3(X2,f4(X3,c28))
| ~ p3(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| ~ p2(X2,c30)
| ~ p3(X3,f4(X2,c28))
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
p3_5 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p24(X1,c29)
| ~ p2(X2,c30)
| ~ p3(X1,f4(X2,c28)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p24(f4(c27,c28),c29),
not_p24_16 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f4(X1,c28),c29)
| ~ p2(X1,c30) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p2(c27,c30),
p2_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SYN648-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:35:09 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.o5tc31iBn0/E---3.1_15504.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 15582 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15587 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 152
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 151
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 170
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 149
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 170
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 21
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 106
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 89
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 82
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 373
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 45
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3482
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2065
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4062
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------