TSTP Solution File: SYN647-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN647-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.92s 2.10s
% Output   : Refutation 1.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN647-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:12:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Mon Jul 11 21:12:17 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20429.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.20/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.20/0.36  in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.85/1.07  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.85/1.07  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.85/1.07  number of clauses in intial UL: 24
% 0.85/1.07  number of clauses initially in problem: 44
% 0.85/1.07  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 54
% 0.85/1.07  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.85/1.07  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.85/1.07  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.85/1.07     distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.85/1.07     distinct function count: 11
% 0.85/1.07     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.00/1.17  
% 1.00/1.17  
% 1.00/1.17  Changing weight limit from 60 to 24.
% 1.00/1.17  
% 1.00/1.17  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 100 givens.
% 1.00/1.17  
% 1.03/1.22  
% 1.03/1.22  
% 1.03/1.22  Changing weight limit from 24 to 21.
% 1.03/1.22  
% 1.03/1.22  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 105 givens.
% 1.03/1.22  
% 1.06/1.23  
% 1.06/1.23  
% 1.06/1.23  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.06/1.23  
% 1.06/1.23  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 110 givens.
% 1.06/1.23  
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 120 givens.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.19/1.38  
% 1.19/1.38  
% 1.19/1.38  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.19/1.38  
% 1.19/1.38  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 200 givens.
% 1.19/1.38  
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.63 sec ----> 14804 [binary,14803.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  1 [] {+} -p21(f17(c25),f17(c22)).
% 1.92/2.10  16 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 1.92/2.10  24 [] {+} p21(f17(A),f17(B))| -p2(f12(f11(A)),f7(c24))| -p2(f12(f11(B)),f7(c24))| -p2(f13(f11(A)),f13(f11(B)))| -p20(f14(f11(A)),f14(f11(B))).
% 1.92/2.10  29 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 1.92/2.10  31 [] {-} p2(f12(f11(c22)),f7(c24)).
% 1.92/2.10  32 [] {-} p2(f12(f11(c25)),f7(c24)).
% 1.92/2.10  34 [] {-} p20(f14(f11(c25)),f14(f11(c22))).
% 1.92/2.10  36 [] {-} p2(f13(f11(c23)),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.92/2.10  37 [] {-} p2(f13(f11(c23)),f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24)))))))))).
% 1.92/2.10  38 [] {-} p2(f13(f11(c25)),f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24)))))))))).
% 1.92/2.10  165 [hyper,37,16,36] {-} p2(f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24))))))))),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.92/2.10  302 [hyper,38,16,29] {-} p2(f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24))))))))),f13(f11(c25))).
% 1.92/2.10  14076 [hyper,302,16,165] {-} p2(f13(f11(c25)),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.92/2.10  14803 [hyper,14076,24,32,31,34] {-} p21(f17(c25),f17(c22)).
% 1.92/2.10  14804 [binary,14803.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.92/2.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  ============ end of search ============
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Process 20429 finished Mon Jul 11 21:12:19 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------