TSTP Solution File: SYN642-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SYN642-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN642-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:43:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.35  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.35  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.35  #
% 0.13/0.35  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.35  # Number of axioms: 42 Number of unprocessed: 42
% 0.13/0.35  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.35  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.35  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.36  # 42 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 42 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.36  # There are 42 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.36  # Found 15 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.36  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.36  # 42 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.36  # 27 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.36  # 15 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.58  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.58  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.58  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (p15(f3(c19)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (p15(f3(c18)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (p6(f8(f3(c19)),f8(c19)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (p6(f8(f3(c18)),f8(c18)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (p6(f7(f3(c19)),f7(c19)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (p12(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (p6(f7(f3(c18)),f7(c18)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(f3(c19)),f5(c19)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(f3(c18)),f5(c18)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (~p6(f8(f10(f3(c19),f3(c18))),f9(f8(c19),f8(c18))))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1)|~p2(X2,X1)|~p15(X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (p15(f10(X1,X2))|~p15(X2)|~p15(X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (p6(f8(X1),f8(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|~p11(X3,X2)|~p11(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X2)|~p6(X3,X2)|~p6(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X2)|~p4(X3,X2)|~p4(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (p6(f7(X1),f7(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(X1),f5(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X1),f3(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (p12(f13(X1),f13(X2))|~p11(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,c19)|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,f3(c19)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X2)|~p16(X3,X2)|~p16(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (p12(X1,X2)|~p12(X3,X2)|~p12(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (p6(f9(X1,X2),f9(X3,X4))|~p6(X2,X4)|~p6(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (p4(f14(X1,X2),f14(X3,X4))|~p4(X2,X4)|~p4(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (p2(f10(X1,X2),f10(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_81, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,X3)|~p17(X4,X5,X6)|~p16(X5,X2)|~p2(X6,X3)|~p11(X4,X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,f3(c19))|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,c19))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,c18)|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,f3(c18)))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,f3(c18))|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,c18))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (p6(f8(f10(X1,X2)),f9(f8(X1),f8(X2)))|~p15(X2)|~p15(X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (p6(f7(f10(X1,X2)),f9(f7(X1),f7(X2)))|~p15(X2)|~p15(X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(f10(X1,X2)),f14(f5(X1),f5(X2)))|~p15(X2)|~p15(X1))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_82, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,f10(X3,X4))|p17(X1,X2,X3)|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p15(X4)|~p15(X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,X3)|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,f10(X4,X3))|~p17(X1,X2,X4)|~p15(X4)|~p15(X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2,f10(X3,X4))|p12(f13(X1),c20)|~p17(X1,X2,X4)|~p15(X4)|~p15(X3))).
% 0.19/0.58  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.58  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.58  # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (p2(f10(X12,X11),f10(X12,X11))|~p2(X11,X11)|~p2(X12,X12)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_125, plain, (~p2(X11,X11)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_126, plain, (~p2(X12,X12)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_124, plain, (p2(f10(X12,X11),f10(X12,X11))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_17633, plain, (p4(f5(f10(X12,X11)),f5(f10(X12,X11)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_77])).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_17651, plain, (~p4(f5(f3(c18)),f5(c18))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.19/0.58  cnf(i_0_17649, plain, (p4(f14(f5(f3(c18)),f5(f10(X12,X11))),f14(f5(c18),f5(f10(X12,X11))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_17649, ...])).
% 0.19/0.58  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.58  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.58  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.58  # Child (585) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.58  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------