TSTP Solution File: SYN640-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN640-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.80s 2.03s
% Output   : Refutation 1.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN640-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:26:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Mon Jul 11 21:26:00 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14267.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36  in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.87/1.07  
% 0.87/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.07  
% 0.87/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.07  
% 0.87/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.07  
% 0.87/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.87/1.08  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.87/1.08  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.87/1.08  number of clauses in intial UL: 24
% 0.87/1.08  number of clauses initially in problem: 42
% 0.87/1.08  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 57
% 0.87/1.08  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.87/1.08  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.87/1.08  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.87/1.08     distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.87/1.08     distinct function count: 11
% 0.87/1.08     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  
% 0.87/1.08  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.96/1.16  
% 0.96/1.16  
% 0.96/1.16  Changing weight limit from 60 to 25.
% 0.96/1.16  
% 0.96/1.16  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 100 givens.
% 0.96/1.16  
% 0.99/1.21  
% 0.99/1.21  
% 0.99/1.21  Changing weight limit from 25 to 21.
% 0.99/1.21  
% 0.99/1.21  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 105 givens.
% 0.99/1.21  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 110 givens.
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.08/1.28  
% 1.08/1.28  
% 1.08/1.28  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.08/1.28  
% 1.08/1.28  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 130 givens.
% 1.08/1.28  
% 1.29/1.47  
% 1.29/1.47  
% 1.29/1.47  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.29/1.47  
% 1.29/1.47  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 275 givens.
% 1.29/1.47  
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.80/2.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.80/2.03  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.57 sec ----> 13588 [binary,13587.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.80/2.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.80/2.03  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  1 [] {+} -p20(f17(c25),f17(c22)).
% 1.80/2.03  16 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 1.80/2.03  18 [] {+} p19(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p19(C,D).
% 1.80/2.03  23 [] {+} p20(f17(A),f17(B))| -p2(f12(f11(B)),f7(c24))| -p2(f12(f11(A)),f7(c24))| -p19(f13(f11(A)),f13(f11(B))).
% 1.80/2.03  29 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 1.80/2.03  31 [] {-} p2(f12(f11(c25)),f7(c24)).
% 1.80/2.03  32 [] {-} p2(f12(f11(c22)),f7(c24)).
% 1.80/2.03  34 [] {-} p19(f13(f11(c23)),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.80/2.03  35 [] {-} p2(f13(f11(c23)),f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24)))))))))).
% 1.80/2.03  36 [] {-} p2(f13(f11(c25)),f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24)))))))))).
% 1.80/2.03  162 [hyper,35,18,29,34] {-} p19(f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24))))))))),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.80/2.03  299 [hyper,36,16,29] {-} p2(f7(f8(f9(f8(f9(f9(f9(f9(f8(c24))))))))),f13(f11(c25))).
% 1.80/2.03  13581 [hyper,299,18,29,162] {-} p19(f13(f11(c25)),f13(f11(c22))).
% 1.80/2.03  13587 [hyper,13581,23,32,31] {-} p20(f17(c25),f17(c22)).
% 1.80/2.03  13588 [binary,13587.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.80/2.03  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  ============ end of search ============
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.80/2.03  
% 1.80/2.03  Process 14267 finished Mon Jul 11 21:26:01 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------