TSTP Solution File: SYN638-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN638-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.94s 2.16s
% Output : Refutation 1.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYN638-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:36:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Tue Jul 12 01:36:19 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6652.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35 in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.94/2.15 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.94/2.15 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.94/2.15 number of clauses in intial UL: 30
% 1.94/2.15 number of clauses initially in problem: 41
% 1.94/2.15 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 73
% 1.94/2.15 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 1.94/2.15 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.94/2.15 absolute distinct symbol count: 29
% 1.94/2.15 distinct predicate count: 11
% 1.94/2.15 distinct function count: 12
% 1.94/2.15 distinct constant count: 6
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.94/2.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.94/2.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.78 sec ----> 408 [binary,407.1,30.1] {-} $F.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.94/2.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.94/2.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 4 [] {+} p4(f16(A),f16(B))| -p4(A,B).
% 1.94/2.16 19 [] {+} p22(A,B)| -p4(C,A)| -p4(D,B)| -p22(C,D).
% 1.94/2.16 23 [] {+} p4(f17(A,B),f17(C,D))| -p4(A,C)| -p4(B,D).
% 1.94/2.16 30 [] {+} -p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))).
% 1.94/2.16 34 [] {-} p4(A,A).
% 1.94/2.16 40 [] {-} p4(f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),A,c27),f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),A,c29)).
% 1.94/2.16 41 [] {-} p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))).
% 1.94/2.16 44 [hyper,40,23,34] {-} p4(f17(A,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),B,c27)),f17(A,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),B,c29))).
% 1.94/2.16 87 [hyper,44,4] {-} p4(f16(f17(A,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),B,c27))),f16(f17(A,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),B,c29)))).
% 1.94/2.16 407 [hyper,87,19,34,41] {-} p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))).
% 1.94/2.16 408 [binary,407.1,30.1] {-} $F.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.94/2.16 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 ============ end of search ============
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.94/2.16
% 1.94/2.16 Process 6652 finished Tue Jul 12 01:36:21 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------