TSTP Solution File: SYN637-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN637-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p22_28,negated_conjecture,
( p22(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p4(X4,X2)
| ~ p22(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p22_28) ).
cnf(p4_4,negated_conjecture,
p4(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p4_4) ).
cnf(p4_12,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p4(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p4_12) ).
cnf(p22_40,negated_conjecture,
p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p22_40) ).
cnf(not_p22_41,negated_conjecture,
~ p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',not_p22_41) ).
cnf(p4_32,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))
| ~ p4(X1,X3)
| ~ p4(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p4_32) ).
cnf(p4_39,negated_conjecture,
p4(f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X1,c27),f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X1,c29)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p',p4_39) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p22(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p4(X4,X2)
| ~ p22(X3,X4) ),
p22_28 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p4(X1,X1),
p4_4 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p22(X1,X2)
| ~ p22(X3,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p4(X1,X2) ),
p4_12 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p22(f16(X1),X2)
| ~ p22(f16(X3),X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
p22_40 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
not_p22_41 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p22(f16(X1),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27))))
| ~ p4(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27)),f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))
| ~ p4(X1,X3)
| ~ p4(X2,X4) ),
p4_32 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p4(f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X1,c27),f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X1,c29)),
p4_39 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYN637-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:25:19 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xljsfwm83T/E---3.1_17298.p
% 0.15/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 17376 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17379 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 41
% 0.15/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Initial clauses : 41
% 0.15/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.15/0.44 # Processed clauses : 247
% 0.15/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # ...subsumed : 50
% 0.15/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 197
% 0.15/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Generated clauses : 364
% 0.15/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 349
% 0.15/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Paramodulations : 364
% 0.15/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 156
% 0.15/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 139
% 0.15/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 184
% 0.15/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 605
% 0.15/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 41
% 0.15/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3768
% 0.15/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3425
% 0.15/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 50
% 0.15/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.15/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6873
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.44 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.44 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.15/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------