TSTP Solution File: SYN636-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN636-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:12:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYN636-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:29:49 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.11/0.36 #
% 0.11/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.36 # Number of axioms: 40 Number of unprocessed: 40
% 0.11/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.11/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.11/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.11/0.36 # 40 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.11/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 40 conjectures.
% 0.11/0.36 # There are 40 start rule candidates:
% 0.11/0.36 # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.11/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.11/0.36 # 40 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.11/0.36 # 31 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.11/0.36 # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (p10(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (p5(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(f6(X1,f7(X2,X3))),X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (~p3(c23,f8(c24)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (~p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (p10(X1,X2)|~p10(X3,X2)|~p10(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X2)|~p9(X3,X2)|~p9(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (p5(X1,X2)|~p5(X3,X2)|~p5(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (p10(f12(X1),f12(X2))|~p10(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,X1)))|~p22(X1,f15(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,X1)))|~p22(X1,f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (p3(f8(X1),f8(X2))|~p3(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (p14(f15(X1),f15(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (p14(f16(X1),f16(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X2)|~p3(X3,X2)|~p3(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1,X2)|~p14(X3,X2)|~p14(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (p22(X1,X2)|~p22(X3,X4)|~p14(X4,X2)|~p10(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (p10(f13(X1,X2),f13(X3,X4))|~p10(X2,X4)|~p10(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (p5(f7(X1,X2),f7(X3,X4))|~p3(X2,X4)|~p3(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))|~p3(X1,X3)|~p5(X2,X4))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (p21(X1,X2)|~p21(X3,X4)|~p10(X3,X1)|~p10(X4,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (p10(f11(X1,X2,X3),f11(X4,X5,X6))|~p2(X1,X4)|~p9(X2,X5)|~p10(X3,X6))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (p22(f20(X1,X2,X3),f15(X1))|p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (p10(f20(X1,X2,X3),f20(X4,X5,X6))|~p2(X1,X4)|~p10(X3,X6)|~p10(X2,X5))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (p10(f19(X1,X2,X3),f19(X4,X5,X6))|~p2(X1,X4)|~p10(X3,X6)|~p10(X2,X5))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (p10(f18(X1,X2,X3),f18(X4,X5,X6))|~p2(X1,X4)|~p10(X3,X6)|~p10(X2,X5))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (p10(f17(X1,X2,X3),f17(X4,X5,X6))|~p2(X1,X4)|~p10(X3,X6)|~p10(X2,X5))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (p22(f19(X1,X2,X3),f16(X1))|p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c32,X2),f11(X1,c32,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (p22(f18(X1,X2,X3),f16(X1))|p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c31,X2),f11(X1,c31,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (p22(f17(X1,X2,X3),f16(X1))|p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c30,X2),f11(X1,c30,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3))|~p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f20(X1,X2,X3)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c30,X2),f11(X1,c30,X3))|~p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f17(X1,X2,X3)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c32,X2),f11(X1,c32,X3))|~p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f19(X1,X2,X3)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))|p10(f11(X1,c31,X2),f11(X1,c31,X3))|~p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f18(X1,X2,X3)))))).
% 0.19/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39 # Found 9 steps
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))|p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29))|~p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,f20(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_65])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_64])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_233, plain, (~p5(X13,X13)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_43])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_231, plain, (p2(f6(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),X13),f6(f8(c24),X13))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_72])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_257, plain, (~p10(X9,X9)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_258, plain, (~p10(X8,X8)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (~p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,f20(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_92, ...])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_255, plain, (p10(f17(f6(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),X13),X8,X9),f17(f6(f8(c24),X13),X8,X9))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_255, ...])).
% 0.19/0.39 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.39 # Child (15001) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.39 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------