TSTP Solution File: SYN633-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SYN633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:04:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 43 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 16 ~; 19 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f331,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f116,f318,f330]) ).
fof(f330,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f329]) ).
fof(f329,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f319,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
~ p3(c23,f8(c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p3_7) ).
fof(f319,plain,
( p3(c23,f8(c24))
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f111,f46]) ).
fof(f46,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ p3(f4(f6(X0,f7(X1,X2))),X3)
| p3(X1,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X8,X6,X7] : p3(f4(f6(X6,f7(X7,X8))),X7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_8) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
! [X3,X26,X25] :
( ~ p3(X3,X25)
| ~ p3(X3,X26)
| p3(X25,X26) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_17) ).
fof(f111,plain,
( p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f109]) ).
fof(f109,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f318,plain,
( spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f317,f113,f109]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> p22(f17(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29),f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)))) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f317,plain,
( p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f315,f25]) ).
fof(f25,axiom,
~ p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p10_25) ).
fof(f315,plain,
( p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29))
| p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f186,f38]) ).
fof(f38,axiom,
! [X83,X84,X85] :
( ~ p21(f12(f13(X84,X85)),f12(f13(X84,f17(X83,X84,X85))))
| p10(f11(X83,c27,X84),f11(X83,c27,X85))
| p3(f4(X83),f8(c24)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_38) ).
fof(f186,plain,
( p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,f17(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29))))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f115,f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
! [X51] :
( ~ p22(X51,f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))))
| p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,X51))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21_26) ).
fof(f115,plain,
( p22(f17(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29),f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f113]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f105,f113,f109]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
( p22(f17(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c28,c29),f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))))
| p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f33,f25]) ).
fof(f33,axiom,
! [X83,X84,X85] :
( p10(f11(X83,c27,X84),f11(X83,c27,X85))
| p22(f17(X83,X84,X85),f16(X83))
| p3(f4(X83),f8(c24)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_33) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 02:18:33 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % (1069)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.13/0.36 % (1075)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1071)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1070)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1073)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1072)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1074)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1076)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (1075)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Memory used [KB]: 915
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)Instructions burned: 24 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (1075)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (1069)Success in time 0.009 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------