TSTP Solution File: SYN633-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 11 unt; 5 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p21_26,negated_conjecture,
( p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,X1)))
| ~ p22(X1,f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p21_26) ).
cnf(p3_33,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))
| p22(f17(X1,X2,X3),f16(X1))
| p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p3_33) ).
cnf(p3_17,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p3(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p3_17) ).
cnf(p3_8,negated_conjecture,
p3(f4(f6(X1,f7(X2,X3))),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p3_8) ).
cnf(p3_38,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))
| p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3))
| ~ p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f17(X1,X2,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p3_38) ).
cnf(not_p10_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',not_p10_25) ).
cnf(p3_4,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',p3_4) ).
cnf(not_p3_7,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(c23,f8(c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p',not_p3_7) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,X1)))
| ~ p22(X1,f16(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)))) ),
p21_26 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))
| p22(f17(X1,X2,X3),f16(X1))
| p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3)) ),
p3_33 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p3(X3,X2) ),
p3_17 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p3(f4(f6(X1,f7(X2,X3))),X2),
p3_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f8(c24))
| p10(f11(X1,c27,X2),f11(X1,c27,X3))
| ~ p21(f12(f13(X2,X3)),f12(f13(X2,f17(X1,X2,X3)))) ),
p3_38 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p21(f12(f13(c28,c29)),f12(f13(c28,f17(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),X1,X2))))
| p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24))
| p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,X1),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p10(f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c28),f11(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26)),c27,c29)),
not_p10_25 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
p3_4 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(f4(f6(X3,f7(X2,X4))),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p3(f4(f6(c25,f7(c23,c26))),f8(c24)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p3(f8(c24),c23),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(c23,f8(c24)),
not_p3_7 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:52:59 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sM3Q0U6yWa/E---3.1_31529.p
% 0.20/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 31606 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 31611 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses : 40
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 40
% 0.20/0.51 # Processed clauses : 162
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.20/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 157
% 0.20/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.20/0.51 # Generated clauses : 437
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 382
% 0.20/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Paramodulations : 437
% 0.20/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 62
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 109
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 290
% 0.20/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 436
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 48
% 0.20/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1086
% 0.20/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 887
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 0.20/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 30
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10020
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.081 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.089 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------