TSTP Solution File: SYN631-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 12.34s 12.59s
% Output : Refutation 12.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:12:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Mon Jul 11 17:12:19 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8469.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.37 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.37 in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/1.00 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/1.00 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/1.00 number of clauses in intial UL: 26
% 0.76/1.00 number of clauses initially in problem: 38
% 0.76/1.00 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 68
% 0.76/1.00 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.76/1.00 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 97
% 0.76/1.00 absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.76/1.00 distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.76/1.00 distinct function count: 11
% 0.76/1.00 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.83/1.06
% 0.83/1.06
% 0.83/1.06 Changing weight limit from 60 to 25.
% 0.83/1.06
% 0.83/1.06 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 50 givens.
% 0.83/1.06
% 0.90/1.14
% 0.90/1.14
% 0.90/1.14 Changing weight limit from 25 to 21.
% 0.90/1.14
% 0.90/1.14 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 55 givens.
% 0.90/1.14
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 60 givens.
% 0.90/1.15
% 1.00/1.20
% 1.00/1.20
% 1.00/1.20 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.00/1.20
% 1.00/1.20 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 75 givens.
% 1.00/1.20
% 1.06/1.30
% 1.06/1.30
% 1.06/1.30 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.06/1.30
% 1.06/1.30 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 110 givens.
% 1.06/1.30
% 1.21/1.40
% 1.21/1.40
% 1.21/1.40 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 1.21/1.40
% 1.21/1.40 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 140 givens.
% 1.21/1.40
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 1.45/1.68
% 1.45/1.68 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 245 givens.
% 1.45/1.68
% 2.75/2.97
% 2.75/2.97
% 2.75/2.97 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 2.75/2.97
% 2.75/2.97 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 2.75/2.97
% 2.75/2.97
% 2.75/2.97 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 595 givens.
% 2.75/2.97
% 5.04/5.26
% 5.04/5.26
% 5.04/5.26 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 5.04/5.26
% 5.04/5.26 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 965 givens.
% 5.04/5.26
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 10.27 sec ----> 31090 [binary,31089.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 6.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 12.34/12.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 12.34/12.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 1 [] {+} -p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),f11(c24)).
% 12.34/12.59 6 [] {+} p5(f16(A),f16(B))| -p5(A,B).
% 12.34/12.59 13 [] {+} p5(A,B)| -p5(C,A)| -p5(C,B).
% 12.34/12.59 17 [] {+} p23(A,B)| -p12(C,A)| -p23(C,D)| -p10(D,B).
% 12.34/12.59 20 [] {+} p12(f13(A,B),f13(C,D))| -p5(A,C)| -p5(B,D).
% 12.34/12.59 22 [] {+} p5(A,f18(f20(c29),f19(B,A,C)))| -p23(f13(A,C),f11(f15(B))).
% 12.34/12.59 23 [] {+} p23(f13(f19(A,B,C),C),f11(A))| -p23(f13(B,C),f11(f15(A))).
% 12.34/12.59 27 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 12.34/12.59 31 [] {-} p5(A,A).
% 12.34/12.59 37 [] {-} p5(f16(f18(A,B)),B).
% 12.34/12.59 38 [] {-} p23(f13(c27,f14(c28)),f11(f15(c24))).
% 12.34/12.59 141 [hyper,38,23] {-} p23(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f14(c28)),f11(c24)).
% 12.34/12.59 142 [hyper,38,22] {-} p5(c27,f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))).
% 12.34/12.59 7877 [hyper,142,13,31] {-} p5(f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28))),c27).
% 12.34/12.59 11839 [hyper,7877,6] {-} p5(f16(f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))),f16(c27)).
% 12.34/12.59 28384 [hyper,11839,13,37] {-} p5(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f16(c27)).
% 12.34/12.59 28413 [hyper,28384,20,31] {-} p12(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),A),f13(f16(c27),A)).
% 12.34/12.59 31089 [hyper,28413,17,141,27] {-} p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),f11(c24)).
% 12.34/12.59 31090 [binary,31089.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 % SZS output end Refutation
% 12.34/12.59 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 ============ end of search ============
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 12.34/12.59
% 12.34/12.59 Process 8469 finished Mon Jul 11 17:12:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------