TSTP Solution File: SYN631-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.90s 1.22s
% Output : Refutation 0.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 16:55:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.90/1.22 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.90/1.22 Process 2268 was started by sandbox2 on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.90/1.22 Mon Jul 11 16:55:23 2022
% 0.90/1.22 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2113_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2113_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.90/1.22 set(auto2).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.90/1.22 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.90/1.22 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.90/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.90/1.22 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.90/1.22 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.90/1.22 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.90/1.22 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.90/1.22 clear(print_given).
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (38 formulas)
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Auto_denials:
% 0.90/1.22 % copying label not_p23_13 to answer in negative clause
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.90/1.22 Function symbol KB weights: c24=1. c25=1. c26=1. c28=1. c27=1. c29=1. f13=1. f18=1. f11=1. f15=1. f14=1. f16=1. f17=1. f20=1. f4=1. f19=1. f8=1.
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3764
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3543
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3381
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.90/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.90/1.22 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % Proof 1 at 0.28 (+ 0.01) seconds: not_p23_13.
% 0.90/1.22 % Length of proof is 22.
% 0.90/1.22 % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.90/1.22 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.90/1.22 % Given clauses 175.
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 1 p10(A,A) # label(p10_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 5 p5(A,A) # label(p5_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 11 p5(f16(f18(A,B)),B) # label(p5_11) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 12 p23(f13(c27,f14(c28)),f11(f15(c24))) # label(p23_12) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 13 -p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),f11(c24)) # label(not_p23_13) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(not_p23_13). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 18 p5(f16(A),f16(B)) | -p5(A,B) # label(p5_18) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 25 p5(A,B) | -p5(C,A) | -p5(C,B) # label(p5_25) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 29 p23(A,B) | -p12(C,A) | -p23(C,D) | -p10(D,B) # label(p23_29) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 32 p12(f13(A,B),f13(C,D)) | -p5(A,C) | -p5(B,D) # label(p12_32) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 34 p5(A,f18(f20(c29),f19(B,A,C))) | -p23(f13(A,C),f11(f15(B))) # label(p5_34) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 35 p23(f13(f19(A,B,C),C),f11(A)) | -p23(f13(B,C),f11(f15(A))) # label(p23_35) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.90/1.22 47 -p12(A,f13(f16(c27),f14(c28))) | -p23(A,B) | -p10(B,f11(c24)) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(29,a,13,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 64 p5(c27,f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))). [ur(34,b,12,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 65 p23(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f14(c28)),f11(c24)). [ur(35,b,12,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 110 -p12(A,f13(f16(c27),f14(c28))) | -p23(A,f11(c24)) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(47,c,1,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 114 -p23(f13(A,B),f11(c24)) | -p5(A,f16(c27)) | -p5(B,f14(c28)) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(110,a,32,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 701 -p23(f13(A,f14(c28)),f11(c24)) | -p5(A,f16(c27)) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(114,c,5,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 4824 p5(f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28))),c27). [ur(25,b,64,a,c,5,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 5393 -p5(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f16(c27)) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(65,a,701,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 5445 -p5(f16(f18(A,f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))),f16(c27)) # answer(not_p23_13). [ur(25,a,5393,a,b,11,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 5945 -p5(f18(A,f19(c24,c27,f14(c28))),c27) # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(5445,a,18,a)].
% 0.90/1.22 5946 $F # answer(not_p23_13). [resolve(5945,a,4824,a)].
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Given=175. Generated=15643. Kept=5945. proofs=1.
% 0.90/1.22 Usable=174. Sos=5764. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=43. Hints=0.
% 0.90/1.22 Megabytes=5.04.
% 0.90/1.22 User_CPU=0.28, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.90/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.90/1.22
% 0.90/1.22 Process 2268 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 16:55:23 2022
% 0.90/1.22 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------