TSTP Solution File: SYN631-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:18:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.40s 1.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 61 ( 0 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p5_25,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,X2)
| ~ p5(X3,X1)
| ~ p5(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p5_25) ).
cnf(p5_5,negated_conjecture,
p5(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p5_5) ).
cnf(p5_34,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,f18(f20(c29),f19(X2,X1,X3)))
| ~ p23(f13(X1,X3),f11(f15(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p5_34) ).
cnf(p23_12,negated_conjecture,
p23(f13(c27,f14(c28)),f11(f15(c24))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p23_12) ).
cnf(p5_11,negated_conjecture,
p5(f16(f18(X1,X2)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p5_11) ).
cnf(p5_18,negated_conjecture,
( p5(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p5(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p5_18) ).
cnf(p23_35,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f13(f19(X1,X2,X3),X3),f11(X1))
| ~ p23(f13(X2,X3),f11(f15(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p23_35) ).
cnf(p12_32,negated_conjecture,
( p12(f13(X1,X2),f13(X3,X4))
| ~ p5(X1,X3)
| ~ p5(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p12_32) ).
cnf(p23_29,negated_conjecture,
( p23(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(X3,X1)
| ~ p23(X3,X4)
| ~ p10(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p23_29) ).
cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',p10_1) ).
cnf(not_p23_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),f11(c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p',not_p23_13) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,X2)
| ~ p5(X3,X1)
| ~ p5(X3,X2) ),
p5_25 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p5(X1,X1),
p5_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,f18(f20(c29),f19(X2,X1,X3)))
| ~ p23(f13(X1,X3),f11(f15(X2))) ),
p5_34 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p23(f13(c27,f14(c28)),f11(f15(c24))),
p23_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,X2)
| ~ p5(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p5(c27,f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p5(f16(f18(X1,X2)),X2),
p5_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p5(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p5(X1,X2) ),
p5_18 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p5(f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28))),c27),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( p5(X1,X2)
| ~ p5(f16(f18(X3,X2)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
p5(f16(f18(f20(c29),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)))),f16(c27)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f13(f19(X1,X2,X3),X3),f11(X1))
| ~ p23(f13(X2,X3),f11(f15(X1))) ),
p23_35 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p12(f13(X1,X2),f13(X3,X4))
| ~ p5(X1,X3)
| ~ p5(X2,X4) ),
p12_32 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p5(f16(c27),f19(c24,c27,f14(c28))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( p23(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(X3,X1)
| ~ p23(X3,X4)
| ~ p10(X4,X2) ),
p23_29 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
p23(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f14(c28)),f11(c24)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( p12(f13(X1,X2),f13(X3,X2))
| ~ p5(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
p5(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f16(c27)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( p23(X1,X2)
| ~ p12(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),f14(c28)),X1)
| ~ p10(f11(c24),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
p12(f13(f19(c24,c27,f14(c28)),X1),f13(f16(c27),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),X1)
| ~ p10(f11(c24),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
p10_1 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ p23(f13(f16(c27),f14(c28)),f11(c24)),
not_p23_13 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN631-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:31:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jZw7e8twL0/E---3.1_12611.p
% 10.40/1.81 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 10.40/1.81 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 10.40/1.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # sh5l with pid 12692 completed with status 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Result found by sh5l
% 10.40/1.81 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 10.40/1.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 10.40/1.81 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 10.40/1.81 # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 10.40/1.81 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting G-E--_107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S064A with 163s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # G-E--_107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S064A with pid 12699 completed with status 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Result found by G-E--_107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S064A
% 10.40/1.81 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 10.40/1.81 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 10.40/1.81 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 10.40/1.81 # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 10.40/1.81 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 10.40/1.81 # Starting G-E--_107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S064A with 163s (1) cores
% 10.40/1.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 10.40/1.81 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.40/1.81
% 10.40/1.81 # Proof found!
% 10.40/1.81 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 10.40/1.81 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.40/1.81 # Parsed axioms : 38
% 10.40/1.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Initial clauses : 38
% 10.40/1.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 10.40/1.81 # Processed clauses : 2687
% 10.40/1.81 # ...of these trivial : 798
% 10.40/1.81 # ...subsumed : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 1889
% 10.40/1.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Backward-rewritten : 22
% 10.40/1.81 # Generated clauses : 177537
% 10.40/1.81 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 174854
% 10.40/1.81 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Paramodulations : 177537
% 10.40/1.81 # Factorizations : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # NegExts : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Total rewrite steps : 3503
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional check models : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 10.40/1.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 1829
% 10.40/1.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1371
% 10.40/1.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 10.40/1.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 457
% 10.40/1.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 172201
% 10.40/1.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 223204
% 10.40/1.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 60
% 10.40/1.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26508
% 10.40/1.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21678
% 10.40/1.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6418
% 10.40/1.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 20196
% 10.40/1.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 10.40/1.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 10.40/1.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3423357
% 10.40/1.81
% 10.40/1.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.40/1.81 # User time : 1.156 s
% 10.40/1.81 # System time : 0.114 s
% 10.40/1.81 # Total time : 1.270 s
% 10.40/1.81 # Maximum resident set size: 1820 pages
% 10.40/1.81
% 10.40/1.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.40/1.81 # User time : 1.158 s
% 10.40/1.81 # System time : 0.116 s
% 10.40/1.81 # Total time : 1.274 s
% 10.40/1.81 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 10.40/1.81 % E---3.1 exiting
% 10.40/1.81 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------