TSTP Solution File: SYN630-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN630-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.21s 1.39s
% Output   : Refutation 1.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN630-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:58:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36  Tue Jul 12 04:58:45 2022
% 0.18/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5230.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.18/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.18/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36  40 back subsumes 29.
% 0.18/0.36  41 back subsumes 30.
% 0.18/0.36  42 back subsumes 31.
% 0.18/0.36  43 back subsumes 32.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.61  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.61  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.61  number of clauses in intial UL: 35
% 0.41/0.61  number of clauses initially in problem: 43
% 0.41/0.61  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.41/0.61  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.41/0.61  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.41/0.61  absolute distinct symbol count: 29
% 0.41/0.61     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.41/0.61     distinct function count: 15
% 0.41/0.61     distinct constant count: 8
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.21/1.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.21/1.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.02 sec ----> 70 [binary,69.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.21/1.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.21/1.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  6 [] {+} -p4(f5(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c26),c27).
% 1.21/1.39  26 [] {+} p4(f5(f7(A,f8(B,C)),D),E)| -p21(F,f9(f10(f11(c29))))| -p21(E,f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),B))| -p22(f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),f18(B,f9(f11(c29)))),E)| -p3(D,f13(f15(f17(f16(f9(f11(c29)))),F),f13(f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),G),f14(f16(E),f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),C))))).
% 1.21/1.39  44 [] {-} p21(c28,f9(f10(f11(c29)))).
% 1.21/1.39  45 [] {+} p21(c27,f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),c24)).
% 1.21/1.39  46 [] {-} p22(f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),f18(c24,f9(f11(c29)))),c27).
% 1.21/1.39  47 [] {+} p3(c26,f13(f15(f17(f16(f9(f11(c29)))),c28),f13(f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),c30),f14(f16(c27),f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),c25))))).
% 1.21/1.39  69 [hyper,47,26,44,45,46] {-} p4(f5(f7(A,f8(c24,c25)),c26),c27).
% 1.21/1.39  70 [binary,69.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.21/1.39  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  ============ end of search ============
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  true clauses given           2      (22.2%)
% 1.21/1.39  false clauses given          7
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.21/1.39    34  1         1
% 1.21/1.39    36  3         1
% 1.21/1.39    38  5         3
% 1.21/1.39  tot:  9         5      (35.7% true)
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.21/1.39  
% 1.21/1.39  Process 5230 finished Tue Jul 12 04:58:46 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------