TSTP Solution File: SYN630-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN630-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.67s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SYN630-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:19:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.67/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.67/0.99 Process 25641 was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.67/0.99 Tue Jul 12 05:19:50 2022
% 0.67/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_25487_n027.cluster.edu".
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_25487_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.67/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.67/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.67/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.67/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.67/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.67/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.67/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.67/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.67/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (36 formulas)
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.67/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: c29=1. c27=1. c24=1. c28=1. c25=1. c26=1. c30=1. c23=1. f15=1. f13=1. f12=1. f14=1. f7=1. f8=1. f18=1. f19=1. f20=1. f5=1. f9=1. f11=1. f10=1. f16=1. f17=1.
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.67/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.67/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.67/0.99 % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.67/0.99 % Level of proof is 1.
% 0.67/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 63.000.
% 0.67/0.99 % Given clauses 34.
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 5 p21(c28,f9(f10(f11(c29)))) # label(p21_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 6 p21(c27,f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),c24)) # label(p21_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 7 p22(f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),f18(c24,f9(f11(c29)))),c27) # label(p22_17) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 8 p3(c26,f13(f15(f17(f16(f9(f11(c29)))),c28),f13(f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),c30),f14(f16(c27),f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),c25))))) # label(p3_30) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 9 -p4(f5(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c26),c27) # label(not_p4_12) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 34 p4(f5(f7(A,f8(B,C)),D),E) | -p21(F,f9(f10(f11(c29)))) | -p21(E,f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),B)) | -p22(f12(f9(f10(f11(c29))),f18(B,f9(f11(c29)))),E) | -p3(D,f13(f15(f17(f16(f9(f11(c29)))),F),f13(f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),V6),f14(f16(E),f15(f16(f9(f10(f11(c29)))),C))))) # label(p4_34) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.67/0.99 84 $F. [ur(34,a,9,a,c,6,a,d,7,a,e,8,a),unit_del(a,5)].
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 Given=34. Generated=98. Kept=83. proofs=1.
% 0.67/0.99 Usable=34. Sos=48. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=36. Hints=0.
% 0.67/0.99 Megabytes=0.22.
% 0.67/0.99 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.67/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.67/0.99
% 0.67/0.99 Process 25641 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 05:19:50 2022
% 0.67/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------