TSTP Solution File: SYN628-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SYN628-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:02:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.74s 2.95s
% Output   : Refutation 2.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).

cnf(p9_2,negated_conjecture,
    p9(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).

cnf(p9_6,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c28,c22),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_6) ).

cnf(p9_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p9(f16(X),f16(Y))
    | ~ p9(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_13) ).

cnf(p20_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( p20(X,Y)
    | ~ p9(Z,X)
    | ~ p9(U,Y)
    | ~ p20(Z,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20_26) ).

cnf(p9_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( p9(f17(X,Y),f17(Z,U))
    | ~ p9(X,Z)
    | ~ p9(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_29) ).

cnf(p9_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( p9(f15(X,Y),f15(Z,U))
    | ~ p2(X,Z)
    | ~ p9(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_30) ).

cnf(p9_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( p9(f10(X,Y),f10(Z,U))
    | ~ p9(X,Z)
    | ~ p9(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_31) ).

cnf(p20_34,negated_conjecture,
    p20(f16(f17(c28,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c28),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20_34) ).

cnf(not_p20_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p20(f16(f17(c22,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c22),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p20_35) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    p9(f17(c28,X),f17(c22,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p9_29,p9_6,p9_2]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    p9(f15(X,c28),f15(X,c22)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p9_30,p2_1,p9_6]) ).

cnf(300,plain,
    p9(f16(f17(c28,X)),f16(f17(c22,X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p9_13,45]) ).

cnf(427,plain,
    p9(f10(f15(X,c28),Y),f10(f15(X,c22),Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p9_31,47,p9_2]) ).

cnf(9903,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p20_26,300,not_p20_35,p20_34]),427]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN628-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:30:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  "."
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T00:30:45
% 0.20/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n010.cluster.edu at 2022-07-12T00:30:45
% 2.74/2.95  
% 2.74/2.95  
% 2.74/2.95  #||
% 2.74/2.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.74/2.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.74/2.95  ||#
% 2.74/2.95  
% 2.74/2.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.74/2.95  ;     20945 formulas have been input or derived (from 98 formulas).
% 2.74/2.95  ;      9903 (47%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.74/2.95  ;         9903 (100%) are still being kept.
% 2.74/2.95  ; 
% 2.74/2.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.006   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (36 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.794  32%   Process new row              (20,873 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     1.090  44%   Resolution                   (194 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.005   0%   Paramodulation               (97 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (21 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (21 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (21 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (3 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.285  12%   Forward simplification       (20,873 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.184   7%   Backward simplification      (9,903 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.74/2.95  ;     0.089   4%   Other
% 2.74/2.95  ;     2.455        Total
% 2.74/2.95  ;     2.457        Real time
% 2.74/2.95  ; 
% 2.74/2.95  ; Term-hash-array has 26,383 terms in all.
% 2.74/2.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 21 entries (21 at peak, 21 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 67 nodes (67 at peak, 67 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 21 calls.
% 2.74/2.95  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 21 calls.
% 2.74/2.95  ; Path-index has 26,391 entries (26,391 at peak, 26,391 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ; Path-index has 2,053 nodes (2,053 at peak, 2,053 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ; Trie-index has 26,391 entries (26,391 at peak, 26,391 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ; Trie-index has 117,402 nodes (117,402 at peak, 117,402 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.95  ; Retrieved 58,992 generalization terms in 20,904 calls.
% 2.74/2.95  ; Retrieved 33,068 instance terms in 9,881 calls.
% 2.74/2.95  ; Retrieved 3,701,437 unifiable terms in 16,465 calls.
% 2.74/2.95  ; 
% 2.74/2.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 9805 entries:
% 2.74/2.95  ;     5 with value (4 14)        271 with value (4 19)        3888 with value (4 24)
% 2.74/2.95  ;    35 with value (4 15)        768 with value (4 20)         144 with value (4 25)
% 2.74/2.95  ;   194 with value (4 16)       1740 with value (4 21)        1728 with value (4 26)
% 2.74/2.95  ;   314 with value (4 17)        447 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 27)
% 2.74/2.95  ;   103 with value (4 18)        165 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 29)
% 2.74/2.95  Evaluation took:
% 2.74/2.95    2.459 seconds of real time
% 2.74/2.95    2.312629 seconds of user run time
% 2.74/2.95    0.145774 seconds of system run time
% 2.74/2.95    [Run times include 0.313 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.74/2.95    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.74/2.95    0 page faults and
% 2.74/2.95    162,025,408 bytes consed.
% 2.74/2.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.74/2.95  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T00:30:47
% 2.74/2.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.74/2.95  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------