TSTP Solution File: SYN628-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN628-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 164.95s 21.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 164.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 77 ( 0 equ; 48 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 73 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p20_26,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X4,X2)
| ~ p20(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p20_26) ).
cnf(p20_34,negated_conjecture,
p20(f16(f17(c28,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c28),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p20_34) ).
cnf(p9_31,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f10(X1,X2),f10(X3,X4))
| ~ p9(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_31) ).
cnf(p9_20,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_20) ).
cnf(p9_13,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p9(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_13) ).
cnf(p9_30,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f15(X1,X2),f15(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_30) ).
cnf(p9_2,negated_conjecture,
p9(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_2) ).
cnf(p9_29,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))
| ~ p9(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_29) ).
cnf(not_p20_35,negated_conjecture,
~ p20(f16(f17(c22,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c22),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',not_p20_35) ).
cnf(p9_6,negated_conjecture,
p9(c28,c22),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p9_6) ).
cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p',p2_1) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X4,X2)
| ~ p20(X3,X4) ),
p20_26 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p20(f16(f17(c28,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c28),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
p20_34 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c28),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29))))),X2)
| ~ p9(f16(f17(c28,c27)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f10(X1,X2),f10(X3,X4))
| ~ p9(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
p9_31 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X2) ),
p9_20 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p9(X1,X2) ),
p9_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,f10(X2,X3))
| ~ p9(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c28),X2)
| ~ p9(f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))),X3)
| ~ p9(f16(f17(c28,c27)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f15(X1,X2),f15(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
p9_30 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f16(X2))
| ~ p9(f16(X3),X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,f10(f15(X2,X3),X4))
| ~ p9(f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))),X4)
| ~ p9(f16(f17(c28,c27)),X1)
| ~ p9(c28,X3)
| ~ p2(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
p9(X1,X1),
p9_2 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f16(X1),f16(X2))
| ~ p9(X3,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))
| ~ p9(X1,X3)
| ~ p9(X2,X4) ),
p9_29 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ p20(f16(f17(c22,c27)),f10(f15(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),c22),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29)))))),
not_p20_35 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( p20(X1,f10(f15(X2,X3),f11(f12(f13(f14(c29))))))
| ~ p9(f16(f17(c28,c27)),X1)
| ~ p9(c28,X3)
| ~ p2(f7(c23,f8(c24,c25)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
p9(c28,c22),
p9_6 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f16(X1),f16(f17(X2,X3)))
| ~ p9(f17(X4,X5),X1)
| ~ p9(X5,X3)
| ~ p9(X4,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ p9(f16(f17(c28,c27)),f16(f17(c22,c27))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f16(f17(X1,X2)),f16(f17(X3,X4)))
| ~ p9(X2,X4)
| ~ p9(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_21]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN628-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:02:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oQEV9dXGrE/E---3.1_5121.p
% 164.95/21.25 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 164.95/21.25 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 164.95/21.25 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # sh5l with pid 5202 completed with status 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Result found by sh5l
% 164.95/21.25 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 164.95/21.25 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 164.95/21.25 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 164.95/21.25 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 5210 completed with status 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 164.95/21.25 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 164.95/21.25 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 164.95/21.25 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 164.95/21.25 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 164.95/21.25 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 164.95/21.25 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 164.95/21.25 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 164.95/21.25
% 164.95/21.25 # Proof found!
% 164.95/21.25 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 164.95/21.25 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 164.95/21.25 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 164.95/21.25 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Initial clauses : 36
% 164.95/21.25 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 164.95/21.25 # Processed clauses : 106202
% 164.95/21.25 # ...of these trivial : 64
% 164.95/21.25 # ...subsumed : 97685
% 164.95/21.25 # ...remaining for further processing : 8453
% 164.95/21.25 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Backward-subsumed : 188
% 164.95/21.25 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 164.95/21.25 # Generated clauses : 2121161
% 164.95/21.25 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2050123
% 164.95/21.25 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 35
% 164.95/21.25 # Paramodulations : 2121161
% 164.95/21.25 # Factorizations : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # NegExts : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Total rewrite steps : 409338
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional check models : 1
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional encoding time : 0.428
% 164.95/21.25 # Propositional solver time : 0.178
% 164.95/21.25 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 164.95/21.25 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 164.95/21.25 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 164.95/21.25 # Current number of processed clauses : 8222
% 164.95/21.25 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 57
% 164.95/21.25 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 164.95/21.25 # Non-unit-clauses : 8163
% 164.95/21.25 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1940004
% 164.95/21.25 # ...number of literals in the above : 9255273
% 164.95/21.25 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Current number of archived clauses : 231
% 164.95/21.25 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24485759
% 164.95/21.25 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12215533
% 164.95/21.25 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 97908
% 164.95/21.25 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6177
% 164.95/21.25 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # BW rewrite match attempts : 157
% 164.95/21.25 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 164.95/21.25 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Condensation successes : 0
% 164.95/21.25 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41603252
% 164.95/21.25
% 164.95/21.25 # -------------------------------------------------
% 164.95/21.25 # User time : 19.752 s
% 164.95/21.25 # System time : 0.748 s
% 164.95/21.25 # Total time : 20.500 s
% 164.95/21.25 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 164.95/21.25
% 164.95/21.25 # -------------------------------------------------
% 164.95/21.25 # User time : 19.754 s
% 164.95/21.25 # System time : 0.751 s
% 164.95/21.25 # Total time : 20.504 s
% 164.95/21.25 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 164.95/21.25 % E---3.1 exiting
% 164.95/21.25 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------