TSTP Solution File: SYN623-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN623-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.51s 1.77s
% Output : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : SYN623-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:22:43 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34 Mon Jul 11 15:22:43 2022
% 0.11/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23434.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.11/0.34 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.11/0.34 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34 33 back subsumes 22.
% 0.11/0.34 34 back subsumes 23.
% 0.11/0.34 35 back subsumes 24.
% 0.11/0.34 36 back subsumes 25.
% 0.11/0.34 37 back subsumes 26.
% 0.11/0.34 38 back subsumes 27.
% 0.11/0.34 39 back subsumes 28.
% 0.11/0.34 40 back subsumes 29.
% 0.11/0.34 41 back subsumes 30.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 23
% 0.18/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 0.18/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.18/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.18/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.18/0.40 distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.18/0.40 distinct function count: 6
% 0.18/0.40 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.51/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.51/1.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 4 [ 1 4 6559 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 8 [ 1 1 5290 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 10 [ 2 1 5165 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 11 [ 8 0 1151 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.39 sec ----> 93 [binary,92.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 4.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.51/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.51/1.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 1 [] {+} -p16(c22,c21).
% 1.51/1.77 6 [] {+} p3(A,B)| -p3(C,A)| -p3(C,B).
% 1.51/1.77 11 [] {+} p16(f4(c25,A),B)| -p16(f4(f6(c27,c25),A),B).
% 1.51/1.77 12 [] {+} p16(A,B)| -p3(C,A)| -p8(D,B)| -p16(C,D).
% 1.51/1.77 20 [] {+} p16(f4(A,B),C)| -p2(A,D)| -p18(c26,D)| -p16(f4(c19,B),C)| -p16(f4(D,f13(f15(c28,A),D)),f9(f11(c29,A),D)).
% 1.51/1.77 21 [] {+} p16(f4(A,B),C)|p16(f4(f6(c27,D),f13(f15(c28,A),D)),f9(f11(c29,A),D))| -p2(A,D)| -p18(c26,D)| -p16(f4(c19,B),C).
% 1.51/1.77 34 [] {+} p8(A,A).
% 1.51/1.77 37 [] {+} p3(A,A).
% 1.51/1.77 42 [] {-} p18(c26,c25).
% 1.51/1.77 43 [] {+} p3(c22,c23).
% 1.51/1.77 44 [] {+} p2(c24,c25).
% 1.51/1.77 45 [] {+} p3(c23,f4(c24,c20)).
% 1.51/1.77 46 [] {-} p16(f4(c19,c20),c21).
% 1.51/1.77 48 [hyper,43,6,37] {+} p3(c23,c22).
% 1.51/1.77 59 [hyper,46,21,44,42] {-} p16(f4(c24,c20),c21)|p16(f4(f6(c27,c25),f13(f15(c28,c24),c25)),f9(f11(c29,c24),c25)).
% 1.51/1.77 61 [hyper,59,11] {-} p16(f4(c24,c20),c21)|p16(f4(c25,f13(f15(c28,c24),c25)),f9(f11(c29,c24),c25)).
% 1.51/1.77 65 [hyper,45,6,48] {+} p3(f4(c24,c20),c22).
% 1.51/1.77 77 [hyper,61,20,44,42,46,factor_simp] {-} p16(f4(c24,c20),c21).
% 1.51/1.77 92 [hyper,65,12,34,77] {-} p16(c22,c21).
% 1.51/1.77 93 [binary,92.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.51/1.77 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 ============ end of search ============
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 true clauses given 8 (29.6%)
% 1.51/1.77 false clauses given 19
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 FALSE TRUE
% 1.51/1.77 5 0 1
% 1.51/1.77 7 0 16
% 1.51/1.77 9 0 6
% 1.51/1.77 11 0 6
% 1.51/1.77 tot: 0 29 (100.0% true)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.51/1.77
% 1.51/1.77 Process 23434 finished Mon Jul 11 15:22:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------