TSTP Solution File: SYN618-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN618-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 15.83s 16.06s
% Output   : Refutation 15.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN618-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:13:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.35  Mon Jul 11 22:13:27 2022
% 0.14/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 18090.
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.14/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.35  in usable.
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.14/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 33
% 0.14/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 54
% 0.14/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.14/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 96
% 0.14/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 23
% 0.14/0.38     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.14/0.38     distinct function count: 4
% 0.14/0.38     distinct constant count: 9
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Model 4 [ 2 0 716 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  15.68 sec ----> 116 [binary,115.1,2.1] {+} $F.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 15.83/16.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 15.83/16.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  2 [] {+} -p5(f8(f3(c16),c20),f6(f7(c22))).
% 15.83/16.06  7 [] {+} p5(A,B)| -p5(C,A)| -p5(C,B).
% 15.83/16.06  9 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 15.83/16.06  15 [] {+} p5(f8(A,B),f8(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p5(B,D).
% 15.83/16.06  16 [] {+} p5(A,c20)| -p13(A,c21)| -p13(c19,A)| -p5(f8(c17,A),f6(f7(c22))).
% 15.83/16.06  21 [] {+} p5(A,A).
% 15.83/16.06  23 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 15.83/16.06  26 [] {-} p13(c23,c21).
% 15.83/16.06  27 [] {-} p13(c19,c23).
% 15.83/16.06  30 [] {+} p2(c17,f3(c16)).
% 15.83/16.06  33 [] {-} p5(f8(f3(c16),c23),f6(f7(c22))).
% 15.83/16.06  36 [hyper,30,9,23] {-} p2(f3(c16),c17).
% 15.83/16.06  38 [hyper,36,15,21] {-} p5(f8(f3(c16),A),f8(c17,A)).
% 15.83/16.06  67 [hyper,38,7,33] {-} p5(f8(c17,c23),f6(f7(c22))).
% 15.83/16.06  73 [hyper,67,16,26,27] {+} p5(c23,c20).
% 15.83/16.06  92 [hyper,73,15,23] {-} p5(f8(A,c23),f8(A,c20)).
% 15.83/16.06  115 [hyper,92,7,33] {-} p5(f8(f3(c16),c20),f6(f7(c22))).
% 15.83/16.06  116 [binary,115.1,2.1] {+} $F.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 15.83/16.06  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  ============ end of search ============
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  true clauses given           6      (22.2%)
% 15.83/16.06  false clauses given         21
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06        FALSE     TRUE
% 15.83/16.06     3  0         3
% 15.83/16.06     7  0         1
% 15.83/16.06     8  4         0
% 15.83/16.06    10  1         4
% 15.83/16.06    11  2         2
% 15.83/16.06    12  7         4
% 15.83/16.06    13  4         2
% 15.83/16.06    14  0         6
% 15.83/16.06    15  0         6
% 15.83/16.06    16  2         2
% 15.83/16.06    17  4         1
% 15.83/16.06    19  0         2
% 15.83/16.06    21  1         0
% 15.83/16.06  tot:  25        33      (56.9% true)
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Model 4 [ 2 -5 716 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 15.83/16.06  
% 15.83/16.06  Process 18090 finished Mon Jul 11 22:13:43 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------