TSTP Solution File: SYN616-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:40:02 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.82s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
p2(c25,c28),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(c_75,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| p2(f12(X0,X2),f12(X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_27) ).
cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| p2(f7(X0,X2),f7(X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).
cnf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_29) ).
cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
~ p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p14_30) ).
cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p14(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X0,X5)
| ~ p2(X1,X4)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| p14(X5,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_31) ).
cnf(c_326,plain,
f5(c20) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_327,plain,
f3(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_328,plain,
f8(c21,sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_329,plain,
f12(sP2_iProver_def,c28) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_330,plain,
f7(c22,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_331,plain,
f6(c21) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_332,plain,
f12(sP2_iProver_def,c25) = sP6_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_333,plain,
f7(c22,sP6_iProver_def) = sP7_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_337,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p14(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X0,X3)
| ~ p2(X1,X4)
| ~ p2(X2,X5)
| p14(X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).
cnf(c_338,negated_conjecture,
~ p14(sP4_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_331,c_326,c_327,c_328,c_329,c_330]) ).
cnf(c_339,negated_conjecture,
p14(sP7_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_332,c_333]) ).
cnf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| p2(f7(X0,X2),f7(X1,X3)) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).
cnf(c_341,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| p2(f12(X0,X2),f12(X1,X3)) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).
cnf(c_352,negated_conjecture,
p2(c25,c28),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
cnf(c_353,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).
cnf(c_724,plain,
( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| ~ p2(sP5_iProver_def,X1)
| ~ p2(sP7_iProver_def,X2)
| p14(X2,X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_337]) ).
cnf(c_828,plain,
( ~ p2(c22,X0)
| ~ p2(sP6_iProver_def,X1)
| p2(sP7_iProver_def,f7(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_340]) ).
cnf(c_861,plain,
( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ p2(sP5_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def)
| ~ p2(sP7_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_724,c_338]) ).
cnf(c_862,plain,
~ p2(sP7_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_861,c_353,c_353]) ).
cnf(c_9663,plain,
( ~ p2(c22,c22)
| ~ p2(sP6_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def)
| p2(sP7_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_330,c_828]) ).
cnf(c_9679,plain,
~ p2(sP6_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9663,c_862,c_353]) ).
cnf(c_15656,plain,
( ~ p2(c25,X0)
| ~ p2(sP2_iProver_def,X1)
| p2(sP6_iProver_def,f12(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_341]) ).
cnf(c_15815,plain,
( ~ p2(c25,c28)
| ~ p2(sP2_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
| p2(sP6_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_15656]) ).
cnf(c_15818,plain,
p2(sP6_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_15815,c_353,c_352]) ).
cnf(c_15823,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_15818,c_9679]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 20:31:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.82/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 3.82/1.14 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 3.82/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 12 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 clauses 30
% 3.82/1.14 conjectures 20
% 3.82/1.14 EPR 12
% 3.82/1.14 Horn 30
% 3.82/1.14 unary 18
% 3.82/1.14 binary 4
% 3.82/1.14 lits 53
% 3.82/1.14 lits eq 10
% 3.82/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 3.82/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.82/1.14 fd_cond 0
% 3.82/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.82/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------
% 3.82/1.14 Current options:
% 3.82/1.14 ------
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.82/1.14
% 3.82/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------