TSTP Solution File: SYN616-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:27:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 25 ~; 16 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 21 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f79,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f78,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2] : p2(X2,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
fof(f78,plain,
~ p2(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),f8(c21,f3(f5(c20)))),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f76,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
p2(c25,c28),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).
fof(f76,plain,
( ~ p2(c25,c28)
| ~ p2(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),f8(c21,f3(f5(c20)))) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f75,f27]) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
! [X46,X44,X45,X43] :
( p2(f12(X43,X44),f12(X45,X46))
| ~ p2(X44,X46)
| ~ p2(X43,X45) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_27) ).
fof(f75,plain,
~ p2(f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25),f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f73,f4]) ).
fof(f73,plain,
( ~ p2(c22,c22)
| ~ p2(f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25),f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f44,f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
! [X50,X48,X49,X47] :
( p2(f7(X47,X48),f7(X49,X50))
| ~ p2(X48,X50)
| ~ p2(X47,X49) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).
fof(f44,plain,
~ p2(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28))),
inference(resolution,[],[f37,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_29) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p14(X0,f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21))
| ~ p2(X0,f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28))) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f34,f4]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p2(X1,f6(c21))
| ~ p2(X0,f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)))
| ~ p14(X0,f3(f5(c20)),X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f33,f4]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p2(X2,f3(f5(c20)))
| ~ p14(X0,X2,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)))
| ~ p2(X1,f6(c21)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f31,f30]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
~ p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p14_30) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
! [X51,X56,X54,X55,X52,X53] :
( p14(X51,X52,X53)
| ~ p2(X56,X51)
| ~ p2(X54,X53)
| ~ p14(X56,X55,X54)
| ~ p2(X55,X52) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_31) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 22:26:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % (16171)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (16163)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16155)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16150)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.51 TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Termination phase: Finite model building constraint generation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Time elapsed: 0.070 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (16163)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (16171)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Time elapsed: 0.064 s
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16171)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16147)Success in time 0.167 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------