TSTP Solution File: SYN616-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 897.33s 114.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 897.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (   0 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p14_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( p14(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ p2(X4,X3)
    | ~ p2(X5,X2)
    | ~ p2(X6,X1)
    | ~ p14(X6,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p14_31) ).

cnf(p14_29,negated_conjecture,
    p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p14_29) ).

cnf(p2_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(f7(X1,X2),f7(X3,X4))
    | ~ p2(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p2_28) ).

cnf(p2_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(f12(X1,X2),f12(X3,X4))
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p2_27) ).

cnf(not_p14_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',not_p14_30) ).

cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p2_4) ).

cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
    p2(c25,c28),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p',p2_7) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p14(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ p2(X4,X3)
    | ~ p2(X5,X2)
    | ~ p2(X6,X1)
    | ~ p14(X6,X5,X4) ),
    p14_31 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
    p14_29 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p14(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ p2(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25)),X1)
    | ~ p2(f3(f5(c20)),X2)
    | ~ p2(f6(c21),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(f7(X1,X2),f7(X3,X4))
    | ~ p2(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3) ),
    p2_28 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p14(f7(X1,X2),X3,X4)
    | ~ p2(f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c25),X2)
    | ~ p2(f3(f5(c20)),X3)
    | ~ p2(f6(c21),X4)
    | ~ p2(c22,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(f12(X1,X2),f12(X3,X4))
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
    p2_27 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p14(f7(c22,f12(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),c28)),f3(f5(c20)),f6(c21)),
    not_p14_30 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p14(f7(X1,f12(X2,X3)),X4,X5)
    | ~ p2(f8(c21,f3(f5(c20))),X2)
    | ~ p2(f3(f5(c20)),X4)
    | ~ p2(f6(c21),X5)
    | ~ p2(c22,X1)
    | ~ p2(c25,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    p2_4 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    p2(c25,c28),
    p2_7 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN616-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:38:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YYTqJovl6g/E---3.1_28983.p
% 897.33/114.60  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 897.33/114.60  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 897.33/114.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 29145 completed with status 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 897.33/114.60  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 897.33/114.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # No SInE strategy applied
% 897.33/114.60  # Search class: FHUNM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 897.33/114.60  # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 897.33/114.60  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29151 completed with status 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 897.33/114.60  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 897.33/114.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # No SInE strategy applied
% 897.33/114.60  # Search class: FHUNM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 897.33/114.60  # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 897.33/114.60  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 897.33/114.60  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 897.33/114.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 897.33/114.60  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 897.33/114.60  
% 897.33/114.60  # Proof found!
% 897.33/114.60  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 897.33/114.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 897.33/114.60  # Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 897.33/114.60  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Initial clauses                      : 32
% 897.33/114.60  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 897.33/114.60  # Processed clauses                    : 214121
% 897.33/114.60  # ...of these trivial                  : 313
% 897.33/114.60  # ...subsumed                          : 174676
% 897.33/114.60  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39132
% 897.33/114.60  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 247892
% 897.33/114.60  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2102
% 897.33/114.60  # Backward-rewritten                   : 27
% 897.33/114.60  # Generated clauses                    : 9222615
% 897.33/114.60  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8970181
% 897.33/114.60  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 228
% 897.33/114.60  # Paramodulations                      : 9222615
% 897.33/114.60  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # NegExts                              : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1133830
% 897.33/114.60  # Propositional unsat checks           : 7
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional check models        : 2
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional encoding time       : 5.027
% 897.33/114.60  #    Propositional solver time         : 2.145
% 897.33/114.60  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 897.33/114.60  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 897.33/114.60  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 897.33/114.60  # Current number of processed clauses  : 36971
% 897.33/114.60  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 88
% 897.33/114.60  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 897.33/114.60  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 897.33/114.60  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 36879
% 897.33/114.60  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1475598
% 897.33/114.60  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5517000
% 897.33/114.60  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2161
% 897.33/114.60  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 92388292
% 897.33/114.60  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46634778
% 897.33/114.60  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 177006
% 897.33/114.60  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 513
% 897.33/114.60  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1516
% 897.33/114.60  # BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 897.33/114.60  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 897.33/114.60  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 200073593
% 897.33/114.60  
% 897.33/114.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 897.33/114.60  # User time                : 110.452 s
% 897.33/114.60  # System time              : 1.657 s
% 897.33/114.60  # Total time               : 112.109 s
% 897.33/114.60  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 897.33/114.60  
% 897.33/114.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 897.33/114.60  # User time                : 556.993 s
% 897.33/114.60  # System time              : 3.437 s
% 897.33/114.60  # Total time               : 560.430 s
% 897.33/114.60  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 897.33/114.60  % E---3.1 exiting
% 897.33/114.60  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------