TSTP Solution File: SYN613-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN613-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.36s 0.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p11_15,negated_conjecture,
( p11(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X3,X1)
| ~ p11(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p11_15) ).
cnf(p11_1,negated_conjecture,
p11(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p11_1) ).
cnf(p11_8,negated_conjecture,
p11(c24,f12(f9(c21))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p11_8) ).
cnf(p11_7,negated_conjecture,
p11(c23,f12(f9(c21))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p11_7) ).
cnf(p17_29,negated_conjecture,
( p17(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p3(X4,X2)
| ~ p16(X5,X1)
| ~ p11(X6,X3)
| ~ p17(X5,X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p17_29) ).
cnf(p17_21,negated_conjecture,
p17(c19,f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),c24),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p17_21) ).
cnf(p3_4,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p3_4) ).
cnf(not_p17_22,negated_conjecture,
~ p17(c19,f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),c23),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',not_p17_22) ).
cnf(p16_6,negated_conjecture,
p16(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p',p16_6) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p11(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X3,X1)
| ~ p11(X3,X2) ),
p11_15 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p11(X1,X1),
p11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p11(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p11(c24,f12(f9(c21))),
p11_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p11(f12(f9(c21)),c24),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p11(c23,f12(f9(c21))),
p11_7 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p17(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p3(X4,X2)
| ~ p16(X5,X1)
| ~ p11(X6,X3)
| ~ p17(X5,X4,X6) ),
p17_29 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p17(c19,f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),c24),
p17_21 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p11(X1,c24)
| ~ p11(f12(f9(c21)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
p11(f12(f9(c21)),c23),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p17(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p16(c19,X1)
| ~ p3(f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),X2)
| ~ p11(c24,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
p3_4 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
p11(c23,c24),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ p17(c19,f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),c23),
not_p17_22 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p17(X1,f4(f7(f10(c20),f8(f9(c21),c22))),X2)
| ~ p16(c19,X1)
| ~ p11(c24,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p16(X1,X1),
p16_6 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
p11(c24,c23),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN613-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:46:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E4u1vpJWOo/E---3.1_4649.p
% 0.36/0.75 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # new_bool_3 with pid 4728 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.36/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.75 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.75 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4736 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.36/0.75 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.75 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.75 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.36/0.75 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.75
% 0.36/0.75 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.75 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.36/0.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.75 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.36/0.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Initial clauses : 31
% 0.36/0.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 0.36/0.75 # Processed clauses : 3229
% 0.36/0.75 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.36/0.75 # ...subsumed : 2290
% 0.36/0.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 927
% 0.36/0.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.36/0.75 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.36/0.75 # Generated clauses : 12877
% 0.36/0.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12243
% 0.36/0.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.36/0.75 # Paramodulations : 12877
% 0.36/0.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Total rewrite steps : 4501
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 889
% 0.36/0.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.36/0.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/0.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 863
% 0.36/0.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9063
% 0.36/0.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 33937
% 0.36/0.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 0.36/0.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 226209
% 0.36/0.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 135225
% 0.36/0.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2297
% 0.36/0.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1146
% 0.36/0.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.36/0.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.36/0.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 183023
% 0.36/0.75
% 0.36/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.75 # User time : 0.212 s
% 0.36/0.75 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.36/0.75 # Total time : 0.220 s
% 0.36/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.36/0.75
% 0.36/0.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.75 # User time : 0.213 s
% 0.36/0.75 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.36/0.75 # Total time : 0.223 s
% 0.36/0.75 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.36/0.75 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.75 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------