TSTP Solution File: SYN603-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN603-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 19.51s 2.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_14,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_14) ).
cnf(p2_2,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_2) ).
cnf(p2_21,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_21) ).
cnf(p2_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),f3(f4(c16)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_19) ).
cnf(not_p15_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p15(X1,c21)
| ~ p2(X1,f9(c20,X2))
| ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X1),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),c17)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',not_p15_26) ).
cnf(p15_3,negated_conjecture,
p15(c22,c21),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p15_3) ).
cnf(p2_6,negated_conjecture,
p2(f3(f4(c16)),c17),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_6) ).
cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture,
p2(c22,f9(c20,c23)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p',p2_5) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
p2_14 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
p2_21 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),f3(f4(c16)))),
p2_19 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f6(X2,X3))
| ~ p2(f6(X4,X5),X1)
| ~ p2(X5,X3)
| ~ p2(X4,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(f6(f5(f4(c16)),f3(f4(c16))),f7(f8(c21,c22),c20)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p15(X1,c21)
| ~ p2(X1,f9(c20,X2))
| ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X1),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),c17)) ),
not_p15_26 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(X1,X2))
| ~ p2(f3(f4(c16)),X2)
| ~ p2(f5(f4(c16)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p15(c22,c21),
p15_3 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
p2(f3(f4(c16)),c17),
p2_6 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(c22,f9(c20,c23)),
p2_5 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN603-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:51:33 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qrf8COCXa9/E---3.1_11245.p
% 19.51/2.92 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 19.51/2.92 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 19.51/2.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # sh5l with pid 11342 completed with status 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Result found by sh5l
% 19.51/2.92 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 19.51/2.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 19.51/2.92 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 19.51/2.92 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11353 completed with status 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 19.51/2.92 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 19.51/2.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 19.51/2.92 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 19.51/2.92 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 19.51/2.92 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 19.51/2.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 19.51/2.92 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 19.51/2.92
% 19.51/2.92 # Proof found!
% 19.51/2.92 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 19.51/2.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 19.51/2.92 # Parsed axioms : 30
% 19.51/2.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Initial clauses : 30
% 19.51/2.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 30
% 19.51/2.92 # Processed clauses : 15386
% 19.51/2.92 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 19.51/2.92 # ...subsumed : 10883
% 19.51/2.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 4498
% 19.51/2.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Backward-subsumed : 70
% 19.51/2.92 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Generated clauses : 212319
% 19.51/2.92 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 202385
% 19.51/2.92 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Paramodulations : 212318
% 19.51/2.92 # Factorizations : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # NegExts : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Total rewrite steps : 20308
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional check models : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 19.51/2.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 4397
% 19.51/2.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 19.51/2.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 19.51/2.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 4375
% 19.51/2.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 186954
% 19.51/2.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 947715
% 19.51/2.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 101
% 19.51/2.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4847269
% 19.51/2.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2066401
% 19.51/2.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10952
% 19.51/2.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1201
% 19.51/2.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 19.51/2.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Condensation successes : 0
% 19.51/2.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2924127
% 19.51/2.92
% 19.51/2.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.51/2.92 # User time : 2.323 s
% 19.51/2.92 # System time : 0.077 s
% 19.51/2.92 # Total time : 2.401 s
% 19.51/2.92 # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 19.51/2.92
% 19.51/2.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.51/2.92 # User time : 2.325 s
% 19.51/2.92 # System time : 0.080 s
% 19.51/2.92 # Total time : 2.404 s
% 19.51/2.92 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 19.51/2.92 % E---3.1 exiting
% 19.51/2.92 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------