TSTP Solution File: SYN600-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN600-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:12:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN600-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 16:48:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 0.19/0.36 # and selection function SelectNegativeLiterals.
% 0.19/0.36 #
% 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 29 Number of unprocessed: 29
% 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.36 # 29 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 29 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.36 # There are 29 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.36 # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.36 # 29 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.36 # 21 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.36 # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (p19(c21))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (p19(c22))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (p7(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (p5(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_35, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (p7(f16(c21),f16(c22)))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (p19(X1)|~p19(X2)|~p5(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1),f6(X2))|~p5(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (p7(f16(X1),f16(X2))|~p5(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (p7(f13(X1),f13(X2))|~p3(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (p7(f15(X1),f15(X2))|~p7(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (p3(f11(X1),f11(X2))|~p3(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (p3(f12(X1),f12(X2))|~p3(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (p3(f14(X1),f14(X2))|~p3(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (p7(X1,X2)|~p7(X3,X2)|~p7(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (p5(X1,X2)|~p5(X3,X2)|~p5(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X2)|~p3(X3,X2)|~p3(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (~p3(f4(f6(c21)),f4(f6(c22))))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (p17(X1,X2)|~p7(X4,X2)|~p7(X3,X1)|~p17(X3,X4))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (p18(X1,X2)|~p7(X4,X2)|~p7(X3,X1)|~p18(X3,X4))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (p7(f9(X1,X2),f9(X3,X4))|~p7(X2,X4)|~p7(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (p7(f10(X1,X2),f10(X3,X4))|~p7(X1,X3)|~p3(X2,X4))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (p7(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))|~p7(X2,X4)|~p7(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (p18(f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(X1))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20)))))))))),f15(f16(X1)))|~p19(X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (p17(f15(f16(X1)),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(X1))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))))|~p19(X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (p3(f4(f6(X1)),X2)|~p19(X1)|~p18(f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),X2),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20)))))))))),f15(f16(X1)))|~p17(f15(f16(X1)),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),X2),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20)))))))))))))).
% 0.19/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.38 # Found 9 steps
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (p17(f15(f16(c22)),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))))|~p19(c22)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~p19(c22)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (p17(f15(f16(c22)),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_145, plain, (~p7(f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (p17(f15(f16(c21)),f8(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20))))))))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_58])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_148, plain, (p3(f4(f6(c21)),f4(f6(c22)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_149, plain, (~p19(c21)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~p7(f15(f16(c22)),f15(f16(c21)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_146, ...])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_150, plain, (~p18(f9(f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f4(f6(c22))),f10(f13(f11(f14(f12(c20)))),f11(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(f12(c20)))))))))),f15(f16(c21)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_150, ...])).
% 0.19/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.38 # Child (23861) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------