TSTP Solution File: SYN599-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN599-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 237.76s 30.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 237.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p7_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f9(X1,X2),f9(X3,X4))
    | ~ p3(X2,X4)
    | ~ p7(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p7_25) ).

cnf(p7_3,negated_conjecture,
    p7(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p7_3) ).

cnf(p3_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( p3(f14(X1),f14(X2))
    | ~ p3(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p3_15) ).

cnf(p3_7,negated_conjecture,
    p3(f4(f6(c21)),c22),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p3_7) ).

cnf(p7_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
    | ~ p7(X1,X3)
    | ~ p7(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p7_26) ).

cnf(p19_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(X1,X2)
    | ~ p7(X3,X1)
    | ~ p7(X4,X2)
    | ~ p19(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p19_23) ).

cnf(p19_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(f15(f16(X1)),f8(f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f14(f4(f6(X1)))),f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f10(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(c23)))))))))))
    | ~ p18(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',p19_29) ).

cnf(c21_is_p18_2,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c21),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',c21_is_p18_2) ).

cnf(not_p19_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p19(f15(f16(c21)),f8(f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f14(c22)),f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f10(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(c23))))))))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p',not_p19_27) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f9(X1,X2),f9(X3,X4))
    | ~ p3(X2,X4)
    | ~ p7(X1,X3) ),
    p7_25 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    p7(X1,X1),
    p7_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p3(f14(X1),f14(X2))
    | ~ p3(X1,X2) ),
    p3_15 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p3(f4(f6(c21)),c22),
    p3_7 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
    | ~ p7(X1,X3)
    | ~ p7(X2,X4) ),
    p7_26 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f9(X1,X2),f9(X1,X3))
    | ~ p3(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p3(f14(f4(f6(c21))),f14(c22)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( p7(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X2))
    | ~ p7(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    p7(f9(X1,f14(f4(f6(c21)))),f9(X1,f14(c22))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(X1,X2)
    | ~ p7(X3,X1)
    | ~ p7(X4,X2)
    | ~ p19(X3,X4) ),
    p19_23 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p7(f8(f9(X1,f14(f4(f6(c21)))),X2),f8(f9(X1,f14(c22)),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(X1,f8(f9(X2,f14(c22)),X3))
    | ~ p19(X4,f8(f9(X2,f14(f4(f6(c21)))),X3))
    | ~ p7(X4,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(X1,f8(f9(X2,f14(c22)),X3))
    | ~ p19(X1,f8(f9(X2,f14(f4(f6(c21)))),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( p19(f15(f16(X1)),f8(f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f14(f4(f6(X1)))),f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f10(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(c23)))))))))))
    | ~ p18(X1) ),
    p19_29 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c21),
    c21_is_p18_2 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p19(f15(f16(c21)),f8(f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f14(c22)),f9(f12(f10(f13(f11(c23)))),f10(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(f11(c23))))))))))),
    not_p19_27 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN599-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:34:19 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zKNsZqVMst/E---3.1_2744.p
% 237.76/30.65  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 237.76/30.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 237.76/30.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # new_bool_3 with pid 2823 completed with status 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 237.76/30.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 237.76/30.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 237.76/30.65  # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS21-DFFFFFNN
% 237.76/30.65  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 181s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with pid 2828 completed with status 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c
% 237.76/30.65  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 237.76/30.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 237.76/30.65  # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS21-DFFFFFNN
% 237.76/30.65  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 237.76/30.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 181s (1) cores
% 237.76/30.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 237.76/30.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 237.76/30.65  
% 237.76/30.65  # Proof found!
% 237.76/30.65  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 237.76/30.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 237.76/30.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 237.76/30.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Initial clauses                      : 29
% 237.76/30.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 237.76/30.65  # Processed clauses                    : 15189
% 237.76/30.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 527
% 237.76/30.65  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 14662
% 237.76/30.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 6528
% 237.76/30.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 237.76/30.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 237.76/30.65  # Generated clauses                    : 2736286
% 237.76/30.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2730034
% 237.76/30.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Paramodulations                      : 2736286
% 237.76/30.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6790
% 237.76/30.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 237.76/30.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14615
% 237.76/30.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3822
% 237.76/30.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 237.76/30.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 237.76/30.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10792
% 237.76/30.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1706565
% 237.76/30.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3293060
% 237.76/30.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 47
% 237.76/30.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8001213
% 237.76/30.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6804810
% 237.76/30.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 237.76/30.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32369
% 237.76/30.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 215938
% 237.76/30.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 237.76/30.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 237.76/30.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 92446395
% 237.76/30.65  
% 237.76/30.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 237.76/30.65  # User time                : 28.550 s
% 237.76/30.65  # System time              : 1.136 s
% 237.76/30.65  # Total time               : 29.686 s
% 237.76/30.65  # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 237.76/30.65  
% 237.76/30.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 237.76/30.65  # User time                : 28.551 s
% 237.76/30.65  # System time              : 1.139 s
% 237.76/30.65  # Total time               : 29.690 s
% 237.76/30.65  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 237.76/30.65  % E---3.1 exiting
% 237.76/30.65  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------