TSTP Solution File: SYN593-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN593-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.74s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN593-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:41:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.74/1.01 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.74/1.01 Process 3579 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.74/1.01 Tue Jul 12 00:41:03 2022
% 0.74/1.01 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_3425_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_3425_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.74/1.01 set(auto2).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.74/1.01 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.74/1.01 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.74/1.01 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.74/1.01 clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (27 formulas)
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.74/1.01 Function symbol KB weights: c18=1. c17=1. c16=1. c20=1. c19=1. c21=1. f6=1. f4=1. f14=1. f10=1. f7=1. f8=1. f9=1. f13=1. f11=1.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.74/1.01 % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.74/1.01 % Level of proof is 1.
% 0.74/1.01 % Maximum clause weight is 62.000.
% 0.74/1.01 % Given clauses 27.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 5 p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c19),c20) # label(p15_18) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 6 p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c21),c20) # label(p15_19) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 8 -p3(c21,c19) # label(not_p3_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 9 -p12(f13(c20),f13(c18)) # label(not_p12_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 10 -p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c21)),c20) # label(not_p15_23) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 11 -p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c19)),c20) # label(not_p15_24) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 27 p3(A,B) | p12(f13(C),f13(c18)) | p15(f4(f6(f10(D),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(B)),C) | p15(f4(f6(f10(D),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(A)),C) | -p15(f4(f6(f10(D),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),A),C) | -p15(f4(f6(f10(D),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),B),C) # label(p3_27) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 53 $F. [ur(27,a,8,a,b,9,a,c,11,a,d,10,a,f,5,a),unit_del(a,6)].
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Given=27. Generated=73. Kept=52. proofs=1.
% 0.74/1.01 Usable=27. Sos=21. Demods=0. Limbo=4, Disabled=27. Hints=0.
% 0.74/1.01 Megabytes=0.11.
% 0.74/1.01 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Process 3579 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 00:41:03 2022
% 0.74/1.01 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------