TSTP Solution File: SYN593-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN593-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 13 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p3_27,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| p12(f13(X3),f13(c18))
| p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(X2)),X3)
| p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(X1)),X3)
| ~ p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),X1),X3)
| ~ p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),X2),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',p3_27) ).
cnf(p15_18,negated_conjecture,
p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c19),c20),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',p15_18) ).
cnf(not_p15_24,negated_conjecture,
~ p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c19)),c20),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',not_p15_24) ).
cnf(not_p12_6,negated_conjecture,
~ p12(f13(c20),f13(c18)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',not_p12_6) ).
cnf(not_p15_23,negated_conjecture,
~ p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c21)),c20),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',not_p15_23) ).
cnf(p15_19,negated_conjecture,
p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c21),c20),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',p15_19) ).
cnf(not_p3_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(c21,c19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p',not_p3_5) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| p12(f13(X3),f13(c18))
| p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(X2)),X3)
| p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(X1)),X3)
| ~ p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),X1),X3)
| ~ p15(f4(f6(f10(X4),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),X2),X3) ),
p3_27 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c19),c20),
p15_18 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c19)),c20),
not_p15_24 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ p12(f13(c20),f13(c18)),
not_p12_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(c21)),c20),
not_p15_23 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),f11(X1)),c20)
| p3(X1,c19)
| ~ p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),X1),c20) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p15(f4(f6(f10(c16),f6(f7(f8(f9(c17))),c18)),c21),c20),
p15_19 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(c21,c19),
not_p3_5 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN593-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:32:06 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Eu70aGIIsc/E---3.1_306.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 384 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 389 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 27
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 27
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 65
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 65
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 46
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 46
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 26
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 84
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 107
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1765
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------