TSTP Solution File: SYN591-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SYN591-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SYN591-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:06:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.73/1.02  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.73/1.02  Process 2094 was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.73/1.02  Tue Jul 12 01:06:36 2022
% 0.73/1.02  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_1816_n006.cluster.edu".
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_1816_n006.cluster.edu
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.73/1.02  set(auto2).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.73/1.02      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.73/1.02      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.73/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.02  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.73/1.02  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.73/1.02  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.73/1.02  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.73/1.02  clear(print_given).
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (27 formulas)
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.73/1.02  Function symbol KB weights:  c13=1. c14=1. c17=1. c15=1. c16=1. c18=1. f4=1. f5=1. f6=1.
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.73/1.02  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.73/1.02  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.73/1.02  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 0.73/1.02  % Given clauses 67.
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  3 p7(A,A) # label(p7_3) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  4 p2(A,A) # label(p2_4) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  10 p12(c14,f4(c18,c17)) # label(p12_11) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  12 -p11(c13,f4(c17,f6(c18))) # label(not_p11_12) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  13 -p11(c13,f4(f6(c18),c17)) # label(not_p11_13) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  20 p2(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(C,B) # label(p2_20) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  22 p2(f6(A),f5(A)) | -p12(c14,f4(A,c17)) # label(p2_22) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  25 p11(A,B) | -p3(C,B) | -p7(D,A) | -p11(D,C) # label(p11_25) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  26 p3(f4(A,B),f4(C,D)) | -p2(A,C) | -p2(B,D) # label(p3_26) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  27 p11(c13,f4(c17,f5(A))) | p11(c13,f4(f5(A),c17)) | -p12(c14,f4(A,c17)) # label(p11_27) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.73/1.02  33 p2(A,B) | -p2(B,A).  [resolve(20,c,4,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  36 p2(f6(c18),f5(c18)).  [resolve(22,b,10,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  42 p3(f4(A,B),f4(A,C)) | -p2(B,C).  [resolve(26,b,4,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  43 p3(f4(A,B),f4(C,B)) | -p2(A,C).  [resolve(26,c,4,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  44 p11(c13,f4(c17,f5(c18))) | p11(c13,f4(f5(c18),c17)).  [resolve(27,c,10,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  55 p2(f5(c18),f6(c18)).  [resolve(33,b,36,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  137 p3(f4(A,f5(c18)),f4(A,f6(c18))).  [resolve(42,b,55,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  167 -p11(c13,f4(c17,f5(c18))).  [ur(25,a,12,a,b,137,a,c,3,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  168 p11(c13,f4(f5(c18),c17)).  [back_unit_del(44),unit_del(a,167)].
% 0.73/1.02  179 p3(f4(f5(c18),A),f4(f6(c18),A)).  [resolve(43,b,55,a)].
% 0.73/1.02  185 $F.  [ur(25,a,13,a,c,3,a,d,168,a),unit_del(a,179)].
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Given=67. Generated=236. Kept=184. proofs=1.
% 0.73/1.02  Usable=67. Sos=114. Demods=0. Limbo=2, Disabled=28. Hints=0.
% 0.73/1.02  Megabytes=0.19.
% 0.73/1.02  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.73/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.73/1.02  
% 0.73/1.02  Process 2094 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 01:06:36 2022
% 0.73/1.02  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------