TSTP Solution File: SYN590-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN590-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:04:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 1.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 0 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c16_is_p11_3,negated_conjecture,
p11(c16) ).
cnf(p3_8,negated_conjecture,
p3(f4(c16),f6(c15)) ).
cnf(p11_9,negated_conjecture,
( p11(f9(X4))
| ~ p11(X4) ) ).
cnf(p12_11,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X5,X6)
| ~ p10(f6(X5),f6(X6)) ) ).
cnf(p3_18,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X24),f6(f8(X24)))
| ~ p11(X24) ) ).
cnf(p10_19,negated_conjecture,
( p10(f4(f9(X4)),f4(X4))
| ~ p11(X4) ) ).
cnf(not_p11_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X34)
| ~ p12(X35,c15)
| ~ p3(f4(X34),f6(X35)) ) ).
cnf(p10_26,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X0,X1)
| ~ p3(X2,X0)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X2,X3) ) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15))
| p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15) ),
inference(subst,[],[p12_11:[bind(X5,$fot(f8(f9(c16)))),bind(X6,$fot(c15))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ p11(c16)
| p11(f9(c16)) ),
inference(subst,[],[p11_9:[bind(X4,$fot(c16))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
p11(f9(c16)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p11(c16) )],[c16_is_p11_3,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ p11(f9(c16))
| p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16)))) ),
inference(subst,[],[p3_18:[bind(X24,$fot(f9(c16)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16)))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p11(f9(c16)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ p10(X_158,f4(c16))
| ~ p3(X_158,X_156)
| ~ p3(f4(c16),f6(c15))
| p10(X_156,f6(c15)) ),
inference(subst,[],[p10_26:[bind(X0,$fot(X_156)),bind(X1,$fot(f6(c15))),bind(X2,$fot(X_158)),bind(X3,$fot(f4(c16)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ p10(X_158,f4(c16))
| ~ p3(X_158,X_156)
| p10(X_156,f6(c15)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(f4(c16),f6(c15)) )],[p3_8,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
( ~ p10(f4(f9(c16)),f4(c16))
| ~ p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16))))
| p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15)) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X_156,$fot(f6(f8(f9(c16))))),bind(X_158,$fot(f4(f9(c16))))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ p10(f4(f9(c16)),f4(c16))
| p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16)))) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ p11(c16)
| p10(f4(f9(c16)),f4(c16)) ),
inference(subst,[],[p10_19:[bind(X4,$fot(c16))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
p10(f4(f9(c16)),f4(c16)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p11(c16) )],[c16_is_p11_3,refute_0_9]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p10(f4(f9(c16)),f4(c16)) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_8]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15)) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
( ~ p11(f9(c16))
| ~ p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15)
| ~ p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16)))) ),
inference(subst,[],[not_p11_25:[bind(X34,$fot(f9(c16))),bind(X35,$fot(f8(f9(c16))))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
( ~ p11(f9(c16))
| ~ p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(f4(f9(c16)),f6(f8(f9(c16)))) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_13]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
~ p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p11(f9(c16)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_14]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SYN590-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:29:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.77/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.00
% 0.77/1.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.77/1.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------