TSTP Solution File: SYN590-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN590-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.92s 2.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  12 unt;  17 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  32   ~;  26   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  11   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (;  28   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p5 > p3 > p2 > p12 > p10 > p11 > #nlpp > f9 > f8 > f7 > f6 > f4 > c18 > c17 > c16 > c15 > c14 > c13

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(p11,type,
    p11: $i > $o ).

tff(c16,type,
    c16: $i ).

tff(f7,type,
    f7: $i > $i ).

tff(p2,type,
    p2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c14,type,
    c14: $i ).

tff(c17,type,
    c17: $i ).

tff(p5,type,
    p5: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c15,type,
    c15: $i ).

tff(f6,type,
    f6: $i > $i ).

tff(p3,type,
    p3: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f9,type,
    f9: $i > $i ).

tff(c18,type,
    c18: $i ).

tff(f8,type,
    f8: $i > $i ).

tff(p10,type,
    p10: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f4,type,
    f4: $i > $i ).

tff(c13,type,
    c13: $i ).

tff(p12,type,
    p12: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    p11(c16),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( p11(f9(X4))
      | ~ p11(X4) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_85,axiom,
    ! [X24] :
      ( p3(f4(X24),f6(f8(X24)))
      | ~ p11(X24) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    p3(f4(c16),f6(c15)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_90,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( p10(f4(f9(X4)),f4(X4))
      | ~ p11(X4) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_144,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( p10(X0,X1)
      | ~ p3(X2,X0)
      | ~ p3(X3,X1)
      | ~ p10(X2,X3) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_50,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( p12(X5,X6)
      | ~ p10(f6(X5),f6(X6)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_133,axiom,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ~ p11(X34)
      | ~ p12(X35,c15)
      | ~ p3(f4(X34),f6(X35)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    p11(c16),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X4_4] :
      ( ~ p11(X4_4)
      | p11(f9(X4_4)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [X24_21] :
      ( ~ p11(X24_21)
      | p3(f4(X24_21),f6(f8(X24_21))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_85]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    p3(f4(c16),f6(c15)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [X4_22] :
      ( ~ p11(X4_22)
      | p10(f4(f9(X4_22)),f4(X4_22)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).

tff(c_226,plain,
    ! [X2_88,X3_89,X1_90,X0_91] :
      ( ~ p10(X2_88,X3_89)
      | ~ p3(X3_89,X1_90)
      | ~ p3(X2_88,X0_91)
      | p10(X0_91,X1_90) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_1448,plain,
    ! [X4_170,X1_171,X0_172] :
      ( ~ p3(f4(X4_170),X1_171)
      | ~ p3(f4(f9(X4_170)),X0_172)
      | p10(X0_172,X1_171)
      | ~ p11(X4_170) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_226]) ).

tff(c_1487,plain,
    ! [X0_172] :
      ( ~ p3(f4(f9(c16)),X0_172)
      | p10(X0_172,f6(c15))
      | ~ p11(c16) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_1448]) ).

tff(c_1673,plain,
    ! [X0_177] :
      ( ~ p3(f4(f9(c16)),X0_177)
      | p10(X0_177,f6(c15)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_1487]) ).

tff(c_1727,plain,
    ( p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15))
    | ~ p11(f9(c16)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_1673]) ).

tff(c_2898,plain,
    ~ p11(f9(c16)),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_1727]) ).

tff(c_2901,plain,
    ~ p11(c16),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_2898]) ).

tff(c_2905,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_2901]) ).

tff(c_2907,plain,
    p11(f9(c16)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1727]) ).

tff(c_2906,plain,
    p10(f6(f8(f9(c16))),f6(c15)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1727]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [X5_7,X6_8] :
      ( ~ p10(f6(X5_7),f6(X6_8))
      | p12(X5_7,X6_8) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_2934,plain,
    p12(f8(f9(c16)),c15),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2906,c_22]) ).

tff(c_182,plain,
    ! [X34_84,X35_85] :
      ( ~ p3(f4(X34_84),f6(X35_85))
      | ~ p12(X35_85,c15)
      | ~ p11(X34_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_133]) ).

tff(c_192,plain,
    ! [X24_21] :
      ( ~ p12(f8(X24_21),c15)
      | ~ p11(X24_21) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_182]) ).

tff(c_2961,plain,
    ~ p11(f9(c16)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2934,c_192]) ).

tff(c_2970,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2907,c_2961]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN590-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:12:03 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.92/2.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.92/2.47  
% 5.92/2.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.92/2.50  
% 5.92/2.50  Inference rules
% 5.92/2.50  ----------------------
% 5.92/2.50  #Ref     : 0
% 5.92/2.50  #Sup     : 672
% 5.92/2.50  #Fact    : 0
% 5.92/2.50  #Define  : 0
% 5.92/2.50  #Split   : 17
% 5.92/2.50  #Chain   : 0
% 5.92/2.50  #Close   : 0
% 5.92/2.50  
% 5.92/2.50  Ordering : KBO
% 5.92/2.50  
% 5.92/2.50  Simplification rules
% 5.92/2.50  ----------------------
% 5.92/2.50  #Subsume      : 97
% 5.92/2.50  #Demod        : 179
% 5.92/2.50  #Tautology    : 97
% 5.92/2.50  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.92/2.50  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.92/2.50  
% 5.92/2.50  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.92/2.50  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.92/2.50  
% 5.92/2.50  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.92/2.50  ----------------------
% 5.92/2.50  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 5.92/2.50  Parsing              : 0.26
% 5.92/2.51  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 5.92/2.51  Main loop            : 0.96
% 5.92/2.51  Inferencing          : 0.35
% 5.92/2.51  Reduction            : 0.27
% 5.92/2.51  Demodulation         : 0.19
% 5.92/2.51  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 5.92/2.51  Subsumption          : 0.24
% 5.92/2.51  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.92/2.51  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.92/2.51  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.92/2.51  Total                : 1.49
% 5.92/2.51  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.92/2.51  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.92/2.51  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.92/2.51  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------