%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SYN589-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN589-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: hne
% detected subclass: medium
% detected subclass: long
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 57 #f 9 7)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 9 7)
% (binary-double 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 28 #f 9 7)
% (binary 28 #t 9 7)
% (hyper 28 #t)
% (hyper 159 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 85 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 39 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (binary-unit 45 #f)
% (binary 47 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(26,40,0,52,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 27 [] p7(c20,f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c18),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c21),f9(f11(c19),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22))))).
% 28 [] p7(c20,f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c23),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c25),f9(f11(c24),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22))))).
% 38 [] -p7(X,Y) | -p7(X,Z) | p7(Y,Z).
% 52 [] -p7(f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c18),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c21),f9(f11(c19),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22)))),f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c23),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c25),f9(f11(c24),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22))))).
% 421 [hyper:38,28,27,cut:52] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 9
% seconds given: 57
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    18
%  derived clauses:   472
%  kept clauses:      240
%  kept size sum:     2689
%  kept mid-nuclei:   128
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    82
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  1
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime:  0.0
%  process. runtime:  0.1
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           18
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  2
%  predlist fails:  16
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN589-1+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------