TSTP Solution File: SYN583-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN583-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.69s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN583-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 11:23:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Mon Jul 11 11:23:44 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23357.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 24 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.36 25 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.36 26 back subsumes 20.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 28
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 5
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.49/0.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 4 [ 2 1 1113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 6 [ 2 1 747 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.30 sec ----> 329 [binary,328.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.49/0.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 1 [] {+} -p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16).
% 0.49/0.69 6 [] {+} p2(f4(A),f4(B))| -p2(A,B).
% 0.49/0.69 13 [] {+} p11(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p11(C,D).
% 0.49/0.69 15 [] {+} p2(f6(A,B),f6(C,D))| -p2(B,D)| -p5(A,C).
% 0.49/0.69 25 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 0.49/0.69 26 [] {+} p5(A,A).
% 0.49/0.69 27 [] {+} p2(c13,c18).
% 0.49/0.69 30 [] {-} p11(f4(f6(c15,c13)),c16).
% 0.49/0.69 33 [hyper,27,15,26] {+} p2(f6(A,c13),f6(A,c18)).
% 0.49/0.69 63 [hyper,33,6] {+} p2(f4(f6(A,c13)),f4(f6(A,c18))).
% 0.49/0.69 328 [hyper,63,13,25,30] {-} p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16).
% 0.49/0.69 329 [binary,328.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.69 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 ============ end of search ============
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 true clauses given 31 (36.0%)
% 0.49/0.69 false clauses given 55
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 FALSE TRUE
% 0.49/0.69 5 0 16
% 0.49/0.69 6 0 4
% 0.49/0.69 7 0 39
% 0.49/0.69 8 0 12
% 0.49/0.69 9 0 31
% 0.49/0.69 10 14 8
% 0.49/0.69 11 0 4
% 0.49/0.69 12 56 0
% 0.49/0.69 13 0 2
% 0.49/0.69 14 24 0
% 0.49/0.69 15 0 1
% 0.49/0.69 16 2 0
% 0.49/0.69 tot: 96 117 (54.9% true)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.49/0.69
% 0.49/0.69 Process 23357 finished Mon Jul 11 11:23:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------