TSTP Solution File: SYN581-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:31:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Mon Jul 11 20:31:35 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22333.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35 24 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.35 25 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.35 26 back subsumes 20.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 28
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.20/0.40 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.20/0.40 distinct function count: 5
% 0.20/0.40 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.77/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.77/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Model 4 [ 2 1 1113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.60 sec ----> 913 [binary,912.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.77/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.77/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 1 [] {+} -p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16).
% 0.77/0.97 6 [] {+} p2(f4(A),f4(B))| -p2(A,B).
% 0.77/0.97 10 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 0.77/0.97 13 [] {+} p11(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p11(C,D).
% 0.77/0.97 15 [] {+} p2(f6(A,B),f6(C,D))| -p2(B,D)| -p5(A,C).
% 0.77/0.97 25 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 0.77/0.97 26 [] {+} p5(A,A).
% 0.77/0.97 28 [] {+} p2(c18,c14).
% 0.77/0.97 31 [] {-} p11(f4(f6(c15,c14)),c16).
% 0.77/0.97 34 [hyper,28,15,26] {+} p2(f6(A,c18),f6(A,c14)).
% 0.77/0.97 79 [hyper,34,10,25] {+} p2(f6(A,c14),f6(A,c18)).
% 0.77/0.97 382 [hyper,79,6] {+} p2(f4(f6(A,c14)),f4(f6(A,c18))).
% 0.77/0.97 912 [hyper,382,13,25,31] {-} p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16).
% 0.77/0.97 913 [binary,912.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.77/0.97 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.97 ============ end of search ============
% 0.77/0.97
% 0.77/0.98 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 true clauses given 118 (39.7%)
% 0.77/0.98 false clauses given 179
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 FALSE TRUE
% 0.77/0.98 9 0 25
% 0.77/0.98 10 0 22
% 0.77/0.98 11 0 23
% 0.77/0.98 12 0 12
% 0.77/0.98 13 0 8
% 0.77/0.98 14 0 5
% 0.77/0.98 15 0 1
% 0.77/0.98 16 0 11
% 0.77/0.98 18 0 20
% 0.77/0.98 20 0 21
% 0.77/0.98 22 0 28
% 0.77/0.98 24 0 35
% 0.77/0.98 26 0 37
% 0.77/0.98 28 0 40
% 0.77/0.98 30 23 57
% 0.77/0.98 32 68 54
% 0.77/0.98 34 38 8
% 0.77/0.98 tot: 129 407 (75.9% true)
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Process 22333 finished Mon Jul 11 20:31:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------