TSTP Solution File: SYN581-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:29:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/0.98 Process 7258 was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/0.98 Mon Jul 11 20:29:37 2022
% 0.71/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_7105_n009.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_7105_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (25 formulas)
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c18=1. c17=1. f6=1. f3=1. f4=1. f8=1. f9=1.
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.71/0.98 % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.71/0.98 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.71/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.71/0.98 % Given clauses 47.
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 2 p2(A,A) # label(p2_2) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 3 p5(A,A) # label(p5_3) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 5 p2(c18,c14) # label(p2_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 8 p11(f4(f6(c15,c14)),c16) # label(p11_8) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 9 -p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16) # label(not_p11_9) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 14 p2(f4(A),f4(B)) | -p2(A,B) # label(p2_14) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 18 p2(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(C,B) # label(p2_18) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 21 p11(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(D,B) | -p11(C,D) # label(p11_21) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 23 p2(f6(A,B),f6(C,D)) | -p2(B,D) | -p5(A,C) # label(p2_23) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/0.98 50 -p2(f4(f6(c15,c14)),f4(f6(c15,c18))). [ur(21,a,9,a,c,2,a,d,8,a)].
% 0.71/0.98 76 -p2(f6(c15,c14),f6(c15,c18)). [ur(14,a,50,a)].
% 0.71/0.98 77 -p2(c14,c18). [ur(23,a,76,a,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/0.98 88 $F. [ur(18,a,77,a,c,2,a),unit_del(a,5)].
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 Given=47. Generated=124. Kept=87. proofs=1.
% 0.71/0.98 Usable=47. Sos=39. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=26. Hints=0.
% 0.71/0.98 Megabytes=0.11.
% 0.71/0.98 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/0.98
% 0.71/0.98 Process 7258 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 20:29:37 2022
% 0.71/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------